Videoconference System for Rural Education: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions a Title is Fewest Possible Words

In this paper, we presented issues, challenges, and solutions of videoconference system for rural education. First, we discussed several issues on the implementation of videoconference system for education, particulary in rural area in Indonesia, which covered videoconference requirement, rural condition, and education needs. Second, we presented several challenges consisted of choosing videoconference technology, choosing compression method, system and application development, ensuring quality of services, and ensuring quality of experiences. Based on the issues and challenges, we proposed a solution of videoconference system which is specifically deployed in rural education. The solution was based on WebRTC technology implemented in Intel i5 core miniPC choosen to increase portability of the system. A STUN server was built on Javascript to facilitate communication between each client terminal. A simple and intuitive user interface was designed to facilitate the use of application by rural people. The system was deployed at two elementary schools in Cianjur, West Java, representing rural education in Indonesia. From the experiment, we obtained video sent data rate 82 kbit/s, video received data rate 245 kbit/s, average delay 316 ms and packet lost rate 1.32%. The experiment results showed that the audio and video quality can be accepted by users to implement distance learning.

[1]  Maxim P. Sharabayko,et al.  Intra compression efficiency in VP9 and HEVC , 2013 .

[2]  Boni García,et al.  WebRTC Testing: Challenges and Practical Solutions , 2017, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[3]  Varun Singh,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Simulcast for WebRTC , 2017, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[4]  Jaka Sembiring,et al.  The challenges of delivering multimedia-based learning services in rural areas , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI).

[5]  Mario A. Bochicchio,et al.  A collaborative multi-videoconferencing platform for online optical microscopy , 2015, Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV).

[6]  Gregory A. Bassett,et al.  Multimedia Networks: Protocols, Design and Applications , 2016 .

[7]  Li Ya,et al.  An Enhanced Safety Algorithm for Network QoS Multicast Routing Optimization , 2014 .

[8]  Dan Wing,et al.  Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) , 2020, RFC.

[9]  Kusprasapta Mutijarsa,et al.  Design and implementation of virtual class box 5.0 for distance learning in rural areas , 2016, 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE).

[10]  Jie Chen,et al.  Coding efficiency comparison of new video coding standards: HEVC vs VP9 vs AVS2 video , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW).

[12]  Salvatore Loreto,et al.  Real-Time Communications in the Web: Issues, Achievements, and Ongoing Standardization Efforts , 2012, IEEE Internet Computing.

[13]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Comparison of compression efficiency between HEVC/H.265 and VP9 based on subjective assessments , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[14]  Luca De Cicco,et al.  Experimental investigation of the google congestion control for real-time flows , 2013, FhMN@SIGCOMM.

[15]  Jonathan D. Rosenberg,et al.  Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) , 2020, RFC.

[16]  Mervin T. Hutabarat,et al.  Network Characterization for Delivering Multimedia-based Learning in Rural Areas , 2014 .

[17]  Christina Hattingh,et al.  End-to-end qos network design , 2005 .

[18]  Brandon Muramatsu,et al.  Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata , 2002 .

[19]  Aldo Gordillo,et al.  A model for integrating learning object repository resources into web videoconference services , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[20]  Yoanes Bandung,et al.  A Methodology for Characterizing Real-Time Multimedia Quality of Service in Limited Bandwidth Network , 2016 .

[21]  Detlev Marpe,et al.  Performance comparison of H.265/MPEG-HEVC, VP9, and H.264/MPEG-AVC encoders , 2013, 2013 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS).