The Effect of Five Proofreading Conditions on the Spelling Performance of College Students with Learning Disabilities

This study investigated the effect of five proofreading conditions on the spelling performance of 12 college students with learning disabilities on a composition activity. The proofreading conditions investigated were handwriting with no additional assistance, handwriting with a conventional print dictionary, handwriting with a handheld spelling checker, word processing with no additional assistance, and word processing with an integrated spelling checker. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the results, with proofreading condition used as a within-participants factor. Except for handwriting alone, all of the techniques resulted in significant reductions in the number of spelling errors in the students' written work; however, none of the techniques enabled the students to produce compositions with a mean level of spelling accuracy comparable to that of their nondisabled peers.

[1]  Barbara Jean Blandford.  Effects of a spelling proofreading strategy on the percentage of identified misspelled words and corrected words in learning-disabled students' compositions , 1990 .

[2]  Error Monitoring: A Learning Strategy for Improving Academic Performance of LD Adolescents , 1981 .

[3]  L. Flower.  Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[4]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  S. Salend,et al.  Homework Practices of Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[6]  Catherine Cobb Morocco,et al.  “If You Could Just Push a Button”: Two Fourth Grade Boys with Learning Disabilities Learn to Use a Computer Spelling Checker , 1990 .

[7]  E. Steidle,et al.  Needs of Learning Disabled Adults , 1987, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.

[9]  D. Wechsler.  Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. , 1955 .

[10]  Valarie M. Arms.  A Dyslexic Can Compose on a Computer. , 1984 .

[11]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  The Impact of Content and Mechanics on Judgments of Writing Quality , 1984 .

[12]  E. Polloway,et al.  Promoting Error Monitoring in Middle School Students with LD , 1993 .

[13]  W. Ferrell,et al.  Error Monitoring of Schoolwork by Learning Disabled Adolescents , 1978, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  Cecil D. Mercer,et al.  Teaching students with learning problems , 1981 .

[15]  Teacher Acceptability of Testing Modifications for Mainstreamed Students. , 1994 .

[16]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[17]  N. Gregg,et al.  Coherence: the comprehension and production abilities of college writers who are normally achieving, learning disabled, and underprepared. , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  A. Gajar,et al.  A Computer Analysis of Written Language Variables and a Comparison of Compositions Written by University Students with and without Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[19]  C. Dalke.  Making a Successful Transition from High School to College: A Model Program , 1993 .

[20]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Spelling Checkers and Students with Learning Disabilities: Performance Comparisons and Impact on Spelling , 1996 .

[21]  Assistive Technology for Students with Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[22]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Knowledge of Revision and Revising Behavior among Students with Learning Disabilities , 1991 .

[23]  M. Deck,et al.  A Survey of Postsecondary Programs for Students With Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[24]  David McNaughton,et al.  Proofreading for Students with Learning Disabilities: Integrating Computer and Strategy Use , 1997 .