Variation of Magnetic Particle Imaging Tracer Performance With Amplitude and Frequency of the Applied Magnetic Field

The magnetic response of magnetic particle imaging (MPI) tracers varies with the slew rate of the applied magnetic field, as well as with the tracer's average magnetic core size. Currently, 25 kHz and 20 mT/μ0 drive fields are common in MPI, but lower field amplitudes may be necessary for patient safety in future designs. We studied how several different sizes of monodisperse MPI tracers behaved under different drive field amplitude and frequency, using magnetic particle spectrometry and ac hysteresis for drive field conditions at 16, 26, and 40 kHz, with field amplitudes from 5 to 40 mT/μ0. We observed that both field amplitude and frequency can influence the tracer behavior, but that the magnetic behavior is consistent when the slew rate (the product of field amplitude and frequency) is consistent. However, smaller amplitudes provide a correspondingly smaller field of view, sometimes resulting in excitation of a minor hysteresis loop.

[1]  Roy W. Chantrell,et al.  Measurements of particle size distribution parameters in ferrofluids , 1978 .

[2]  T. Buzug,et al.  A SPECTROMETER TO MEASURE THE USABILITY OF NANOPARTICLES FOR MAGNETIC PARTICLE IMAGING , 2010 .

[3]  Kannan M. Krishnan,et al.  Monodisperse magnetite nanoparticle tracers for in vivo magnetic particle imaging. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[4]  Ondrej Hovorka,et al.  Tailoring the magnetic and pharmacokinetic properties of iron oxide magnetic particle imaging tracers , 2013, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  Kannan M Krishnan,et al.  Tracer design for magnetic particle imaging (invited). , 2012, Journal of applied physics.

[6]  Bernhard Gleich,et al.  Point Spread Function Analysis of Magnetic Particles , 2012 .

[7]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  Magnetic particle imaging , 2012 .

[8]  Kannan M Krishnan,et al.  Tailored magnetic nanoparticles for optimizing magnetic fluid hyperthermia. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[9]  A. Tomitaka,et al.  Self-Heating Temperature and AC Hysteresis of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Dependence on Secondary Particle Size , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[10]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Magnetostimulation Limits in Magnetic Particle Imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Hamed Arami,et al.  Size-dependent ferrohydrodynamic relaxometry of magnetic particle imaging tracers in different environments. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  The X-Space Formulation of the Magnetic Particle Imaging Process: 1-D Signal, Resolution, Bandwidth, SNR, SAR, and Magnetostimulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Kevin R Minard,et al.  Optimizing magnetite nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging. , 2011, Medical physics.

[14]  Patrick W. Goodwill,et al.  Ferrohydrodynamic relaxometry for magnetic particle imaging , 2011 .