Hierarchical Region-Network Sparsity for High-Dimensional Inference in Brain Imaging

Structured sparsity penalization has recently improved statistical models applied to high-dimensional data in various domains. As an extension to medical imaging, the present work incorporates priors on network hierarchies of brain regions into logistic-regression to distinguish neural activity effects. These priors bridge two separately studied levels of brain architecture: functional segregation into regions and functional integration by networks. Hierarchical region-network priors are shown to better classify and recover 18 psychological tasks than other sparse estimators. Varying the relative importance of region and network structure within the hierarchical tree penalty captured complementary aspects of the neural activity patterns. Local and global priors of neurobiological knowledge are thus demonstrated to offer advantages in generalization performance, sample complexity, and domain interpretability.

[1]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Francis R. Bach,et al.  Structured Sparse Principal Component Analysis , 2009, AISTATS.

[4]  Julien Mairal,et al.  Optimization with Sparsity-Inducing Penalties , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[5]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  The Organization of Local and Distant Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[7]  Matthijs Douze,et al.  Large-scale image classification with trace-norm regularization , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Emergence of resting state networks in the preterm human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence , 2008, Neuroscience.

[10]  Michael L. Anderson,et al.  Describing functional diversity of brain regions and brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  Michael Eickenberg,et al.  Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[12]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  Semi-Supervised Factored Logistic Regression for High-Dimensional Neuroimaging Data , 2015, NIPS.

[14]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  Multiscale Mining of fMRI Data with Hierarchical Structured Sparsity , 2012, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[15]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Small-sample brain mapping: sparse recovery on spatially correlated designs with randomization and clustering , 2012, ICML.

[17]  S. Zeki Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1978, Nature.

[18]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[19]  O. Sporns Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[22]  N. Kanwisher Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.