When less is more and more is less in brief motivational interventions: characteristics of intervention content and their associations with drinking outcomes.

Brief motivational interventions (BMIs) that aim to reduce alcohol use and related problems have been widely implemented in college settings. BMIs share common principles, but vary in specific content. Thus far, the variation in content has not been thoroughly understood in relation to intervention outcomes. The present study addressed this gap by examining variation in breadth of BMI content (i.e., total number of components covered), the extent to which content was personalized to participants, and the interaction between breadth and personalization in relation to treatment outcomes. Data (N = 6,047 participants across 31 separate BMI conditions) came from an integrative data analysis (IDA) study featuring individual-level data from a broad sample of 24 BMI studies of college students. Participants were assessed at baseline and at least 1 follow-up point, conducted up to 12 months postbaseline. Structural equation modeling revealed a significant interaction effect between breadth and personalization of BMI content on alcohol use and related problems at the long-term follow-up (6-12 months) but not at the short-term follow-up (1-3 months). Results indicated that "more is better" for reducing both alcohol use and related problems when BMIs were highly personalized to participants. For less personalized BMIs, coverage of more components was associated with increases in both alcohol use and problems. Findings point to the importance of strategically designing BMIs to maximize their impact on drinking outcomes in college students.

[1]  B. Borsari,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. , 2012, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004. , 2003 .

[3]  P. J. Huber.  The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[4]  C. Neighbors,et al.  Live interactive group-specific normative feedback reduces misperceptions and drinking in college students: a randomized cluster trial. , 2008, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[5]  M. Larimer,et al.  Preventing risky drinking in first-year college women: further validation of a female-specific motivational-enhancement group intervention. , 2009, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement.

[6]  H A Skinner,et al.  Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation. , 1982, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  Andrew Lac,et al.  A group Motivational Interviewing intervention reduces drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences in adjudicated college women. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[8]  K. Carey,et al.  Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. , 2012, Clinical psychology review.

[9]  Anne E. Ray,et al.  A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students. , 2009, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[10]  M. Larimer,et al.  A randomized motivational enhancement prevention group reduces drinking and alcohol consequences in first-year college women. , 2008, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[11]  M. Larimer,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitated interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students. , 2009, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement.

[12]  T. J. Morgan,et al.  Do brief personalized feedback interventions work for mandated students or is it just getting caught that works? , 2008, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[13]  J. Crowley,et al.  A Diagnostic for Cox Regression and General Conditional Likelihoods , 1985 .

[14]  H. White,et al.  Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. , 1989, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[15]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. , 2001, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[16]  Brian Borsari,et al.  Brief motivational and parent interventions for college students: a randomized factorial study. , 2010, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[17]  M. Larimer,et al.  Individual-Focused Approaches to the Prevention of College Student Drinking , 2011, Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

[18]  Elissa R Weitzman,et al.  Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. , 2009, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement.

[19]  Darin J Erickson,et al.  Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: a randomized factorial study. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[20]  James G. Murphy,et al.  The efficacy of single-component brief motivational interventions among at-risk college drinkers. , 2013, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[22]  Anne E. Ray,et al.  Examination of posttraining supervision of peer counselors in a motivational enhancement intervention to reduce drinking in a sample of heavy-drinking college students. , 2010, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[23]  H. White,et al.  Associations between alcohol use and alcohol-related negative consequences among black and white college men and women. , 2013, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[24]  M. Larimer,et al.  Brief alcohol intervention for college drinkers: how brief is? , 2010, Addictive behaviors.

[25]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial. , 2009, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  Scott T. Walters,et al.  A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Feedback for Heavy Drinking College Students , 2007, Prevention Science.

[27]  S. Walters,et al.  Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005). , 2013, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[28]  J. Read,et al.  Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: the brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. , 2005, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[29]  Kenneth A. Froot.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Cross-Sectional Dependence and Heteroskedasticity in Financial Data , 1989, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[30]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[31]  Byron L. Zamboanga,et al.  The efficacy of a targeted personalized drinking feedback intervention among intercollegiate athletes: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[32]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. , 2004, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[33]  H. White.  Reduction of alcohol-related harm on United States college campuses: The use of personal feedback interventions , 2006 .

[34]  M. Larimer,et al.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[35]  Kelly S. DeMartini,et al.  Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[36]  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[37]  Helene R White,et al.  Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention. , 2007, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[38]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[39]  A P Turner,et al.  Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. , 2001, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[40]  M. Larimer,et al.  A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of two active conditions of a brief intervention for heavy college drinkers. , 2013, Addictive behaviors.

[41]  K. Fromme,et al.  Health risk behaviors of adolescent and young adult siblings. , 1997, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[42]  Vijay N. Nair,et al.  A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions , 2005, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[43]  Daniel R. Kivlahan,et al.  Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (Basics): A Harm Reduction Approach , 1999 .

[44]  John G. Borkowski,et al.  Designing Effective Prevention Programs: How Good Science Makes Good Art , 2007 .

[45]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[46]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[47]  P. Monti,et al.  Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[48]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[49]  E. Pedersen,et al.  A Group Motivational Interviewing Intervention Reduces Drinking and Alcohol-Related Consequences in Adjudicated College Students , 2006 .

[50]  Kim Fromme,et al.  Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[51]  K. Sher,et al.  Assessing alcohol problems in college students. , 1992, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[52]  E. Pedersen,et al.  A campus-based motivational enhancement group intervention reduces problematic drinking in freshmen male college students. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.