A reduced basis approach for PDEs on parametrized geometries based on the shifted boundary finite element method and application to a Stokes flow

Abstract We propose a model order reduction technique integrating the Shifted Boundary Method (SBM) with a POD-Galerkin strategy. This approach allows to deal with complex parametrized domains in an efficient and straightforward way. The impact of the proposed approach is threefold. First, problems involving parametrizations of complex geometrical shapes and/or large domain deformations can be efficiently solved at full-order by means of the SBM. This unfitted boundary method permits to avoid remeshing and the tedious handling of cut cells by introducing an approximate surrogate boundary. Second, the computational effort is reduced by the development of a Reduced Order Model (ROM) technique based on a POD-Galerkin approach. Third, the SBM provides a smooth mapping from the true to the surrogate domain, and for this reason, the stability and performance of the reduced order basis are enhanced. This feature is the net result of the combination of the proposed ROM approach and the SBM. Similarly, the combination of the SBM with a projection-based ROM gives the great advantage of an easy and fast to implement algorithm considering geometrical parametrization with large deformations. The transformation of each geometry to a reference geometry (morphing) is in fact not required. These combined advantages will allow the solution of PDE problems more efficiently. We illustrate the performance of this approach on a number of two-dimensional Stokes flow problems.

[1]  N. Nguyen,et al.  An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations , 2004 .

[2]  Karen Veroy,et al.  Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Saddle Point Problems , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS , 2005 .

[4]  Alex Main,et al.  The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. Part I: Poisson and Stokes problems , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  Karhunen–Loève procedure for gappy data , 1995 .

[6]  A. Patera,et al.  Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations , 2007 .

[7]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Numerical solution of parametrized Navier–Stokes equations by reduced basis methods , 2007 .

[8]  J. Hesthaven,et al.  Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations , 2015 .

[9]  Thomas W. Sederberg,et al.  Free-form deformation of solid geometric models , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  Bernd R. Noack,et al.  The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Claudio Borri,et al.  A novel reduced order model for vortex induced vibrations of long flexible cylinders , 2018, ArXiv.

[12]  Charles-Henri Bruneau,et al.  Enablers for robust POD models , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Model Reduction of Parametrized Systems , 2017 .

[14]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Stabilized reduced basis methods for parametrized steady Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations , 2020, Comput. Math. Appl..

[15]  Juan Du,et al.  Non-linear model reduction for the Navier-Stokes equations using residual DEIM method , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  C. Allery,et al.  Proper general decomposition (PGD) for the resolution of Navier-Stokes equations , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  Stefan Volkwein,et al.  Galerkin Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Methods for a General Equation in Fluid Dynamics , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[18]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: Effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  克寛 北嶋,et al.  ガウス関数に基づくFree-Form Deformation , 1999 .

[20]  Traian Iliescu,et al.  A numerical investigation of velocity-pressure reduced order models for incompressible flows , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Reduced-basis methods for elliptic equations in sub-domains with a posteriori error bounds and adaptivity , 2005 .

[22]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Dimension reduction in heterogeneous parametric spaces with application to naval engineering shape design problems , 2017, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[24]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for Stokes flows in parametrized geometries: roles of the inf-sup stability constants , 2013, Numerische Mathematik.

[25]  F. Brezzi,et al.  A discourse on the stability conditions for mixed finite element formulations , 1990 .

[26]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Computing Method for All Flow Speeds , 1997 .

[27]  G. Rozza,et al.  POD-Galerkin reduced order methods for CFD using Finite Volume Discretisation: vortex shedding around a circular cylinder , 2017, 1701.03424.

[28]  G. Rozza,et al.  A Reduced Order Approach for the Embedded Shifted Boundary FEM and a Heat Exchange System on Parametrized Geometries , 2018, IUTAM Symposium on Model Order Reduction of Coupled Systems, Stuttgart, Germany, May 22–25, 2018.

[29]  N. Nguyen,et al.  EFFICIENT REDUCED-BASIS TREATMENT OF NONAFFINE AND NONLINEAR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 2007 .

[30]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Projection-based reduced order models for a cut finite element method in parametrized domains , 2019, Comput. Math. Appl..

[31]  Simona Perotto,et al.  A POD‐selective inverse distance weighting method for fast parametrized shape morphing , 2017, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[32]  A. Patera,et al.  Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations , 2007 .

[33]  A. Patera,et al.  Reduced-basis approximation of the viscous Burgers equation: rigorous a posteriori error bounds , 2003 .

[34]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  A reduced order variational multiscale approach for turbulent flows , 2018, Advances in Computational Mathematics.

[35]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Model Order Reduction: a survey , 2016 .

[36]  M. Fortin,et al.  Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[37]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Efficient geometrical parametrization for finite‐volume‐based reduced order methods , 2019, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[38]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Reduced basis methods for Stokes equations in domains with non-affine parameter dependence , 2009 .

[39]  Bernhard Wieland,et al.  Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations with stochastic influences , 2013 .

[40]  C. Peskin Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method , 1972 .

[41]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  On the stability and extension of reduced-order Galerkin models in incompressible flows , 2009 .

[42]  F. Chinesta,et al.  A Short Review in Model Order Reduction Based on Proper Generalized Decomposition , 2018 .

[43]  Alex Main,et al.  The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations. Part II: Linear advection-diffusion and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[44]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuscka-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of , 1986 .

[45]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Supremizer stabilization of POD–Galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations , 2015 .

[46]  Ting Song,et al.  The shifted boundary method for hyperbolic systems: Embedded domain computations of linear waves and shallow water flows , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[47]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Reduction of nonlinear embedded boundary models for problems with evolving interfaces , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[48]  Jean-Antoine Désidéri,et al.  Stability Properties of POD–Galerkin Approximations for the Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations , 2000 .

[49]  G. Rozza,et al.  Free-form deformation, mesh morphing and reduced-order methods: enablers for efficient aerodynamic shape optimisation , 2018, International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[50]  Matthew F. Barone,et al.  On the stability and convergence of a Galerkin reduced order model (ROM) of compressible flow with solid wall and far‐field boundary treatment , 2010 .

[51]  G. Rozza,et al.  Finite volume POD-Galerkin stabilised reduced order methods for the parametrised incompressible Navier–Stokes equations , 2017, Computers & Fluids.

[52]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  The Stokes problem with various well-posed boundary conditions - Symmetric formulations that converge for all velocity/pressure spaces , 1987 .

[53]  A. Patera,et al.  A posteriori error bounds for reduced-basis approximations of parametrized parabolic partial differential equations , 2005 .

[54]  G. Rozza,et al.  On the stability of the reduced basis method for Stokes equations in parametrized domains , 2007 .

[55]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  A stabilized POD model for turbulent flows over a range of Reynolds numbers: Optimal parameter sampling and constrained projection , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[56]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG , 1986 .

[57]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Reduced Basis Methods for Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction , 2015 .

[58]  G. Rozza,et al.  Parametric free-form shape design with PDE models and reduced basis method , 2010 .

[59]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Stability and accuracy of periodic flow solutions obtained by a POD-penalty method , 2005 .