Management of hydrogen sulfide in anaerobic digestion of enzyme pretreated marine macro-algae

Enzymatic pretreatment of algae by means of cellulose degrading enzyme was evaluated through lab-scale and pilot-scale experiments. The degradation efficiency of the enzyme depended on the initial physical quality of the algae. Lab-scale batch anaerobic digestion experiments showed comparatively low methane potential for the pretreated algae at both mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. However, the raw algae (cut into small pieces) were found to be hardly hydrolysable. The methane potential of raw algae in thermophilic and mesophilic digestion was about 17 NmL/g VS and –36 NmL/g VS respectively. Presence of inhibitory agent(s) was obvious at both temperatures. Very fast growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria was noticed in the continuous digestion, so that in less than 20 days, hydrogen sulfide concentrations over 10000 ppm were observed in both meso- and thermophilic reactors. Inhibition of methanogenesis in the thermophilic reactor occurred at unionized dissolved sulfide concentration of about 22 mg/L (10000 ppm in the biogas) while it was mainly non-SRB acetogens that were inhibited in the mesophilic reactor at unionized sulfide concentrations as high as 50 mg/L (17000 ppm in the biogas). This shows that probably thermophilic digestion is more prone to be inhibited at high sulfide concentrations. Micro-aeration was found to be more efficient in the thermophilic reactor while its effect on the mesophilic process was negligible. (Less)

[1]  D. Burska,et al.  Sulfur in the marine environment , 2012 .

[2]  R. Girault,et al.  Sulphur fate and anaerobic biodegradation potential during co-digestion of seaweed biomass (Ulva sp.) with pig slurry. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[3]  S R Guiot,et al.  Electrolysis-enhanced anaerobic digestion of wastewater. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Marika Murto,et al.  Evaluation of biogas production from seaweed in batch tests and in UASB reactors combined with the removal of heavy metals. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Discovery of Lignin in Seaweed Reveals Convergent Evolution of Cell-Wall Architecture , 2009, Current Biology.

[6]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[7]  D. Cirne,et al.  Control of sulphide during anaerobic treatment of S-containing wastewaters by adding limited amounts of oxygen or nitrate , 2008 .

[8]  G. Lettinga,et al.  The methanogenic toxicity of wastewater lignins and lignin related compounds. , 2007 .

[9]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  The effects of operational and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: a review. , 2006, Bioresource technology.

[10]  P. Morand,et al.  Green tides on the Brittany coasts , 2006, 2006 IEEE US/EU Baltic International Symposium.

[11]  J. M. Morgan-Sagastume,et al.  Treatment of Biogas Produced in Anaerobic Reactors for Domestic Wastewater: Odor Control and Energy/Resource Recovery , 2006 .

[12]  Hang-sik Shin,et al.  Competition between SRB and MPB according to temperature change in the anaerobic treatment of tannery wastes containing high sulfate , 1996 .

[13]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Interactions among sulfate reducers, acetogens, and methanogens in anaerobic propionate systems , 1995 .

[14]  Å. Davidsson Increase of Biogas Production at Wastewater Treatment Plants Addition of urban organic waste and pre-treatment of sludge , 2007 .

[15]  T. Hansen,et al.  Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. , 2004, Waste management.

[16]  A. Visser,et al.  Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. , 1998 .

[17]  S. L. Woods,et al.  Anaerobic toxicity and biodegradability of pulp mill waste constituents , 1984 .