Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view

Abstract Robotic surgery (RS) technology has undergone rapid growth in the surgical field since its approval. In clinical practice, failure of robotic procedures mainly results from a surgeon’s inability or to a device malfunction. We reviewed the literature to estimate the impact of this second circumstance in RS and its consequent legal implications. According to data from the literature, device malfunction is rare. We believe it is necessary to complement surgical training with a technical understanding of RS devices.

[1]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[2]  Koon Ho Rha,et al.  A Unique Instrumental Malfunction during Robotic Prostatectomy , 2009, Yonsei medical journal.

[3]  Yen-Chuan Ou,et al.  Malfunction of the da Vinci robotic system in urology , 2012, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[4]  M. Makary,et al.  Underreporting of Robotic Surgery Complications , 2015, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[5]  Oscar Traynor,et al.  Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation transferable to the operating theatre? , 2014, American journal of surgery.

[6]  Matthew Walsh,et al.  Malfunction and failure of robotic systems during general surgical procedures , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  Benjamin R. Lee,et al.  Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database. , 2008, The Canadian journal of urology.

[8]  Robot-assisted surgery and health care costs. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  N. Gupta,et al.  Critical appraisal of technical problems with robotic urological surgery , 2009, BJU international.

[10]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Robot-assisted surgery and health care costs. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  G. Ballantyne.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. , 2002, Surgical endoscopy.

[12]  G. Ballantyne.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  Koon Ho Rha,et al.  Malfunction of da Vinci robotic system--disassembled surgeon's console hand piece: case report and review of the literature. , 2009, Urology.

[14]  Wolfgang Kurz,et al.  Human dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria repens mimicking a scrotal tumor. , 2009, Urology.

[15]  N. Buchs,et al.  Safety of robotic general surgery in elderly patients , 2010, Journal of robotic surgery.

[16]  E. Benedetti,et al.  Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. , 2011, Surgery.

[17]  L. Borden,et al.  Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system. , 2007, The Canadian journal of urology.

[18]  M. Makary,et al.  Surgical malpractice claims in the United States. , 2014, Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management.

[19]  Geoffrey N. Box,et al.  Robotic instrument insulation failure: initial report of a potential source of patient injury. , 2011, Urology.

[20]  Randy Fagin,et al.  Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[21]  Mevlana Derya Balbay,et al.  What if the Hand Piece Spring Disassembles During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy? , 2011, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[22]  Kevin C Zorn,et al.  Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[23]  W. Jeong,et al.  Failure and malfunction of da Vinci Surgical systems during various robotic surgeries: experience from six departments at a single institute. , 2009, Urology.

[24]  Massimo Amato,et al.  La responsabilità professionale in odontoiatria: analisi di una casistica interdipartimentale , 2015 .

[25]  J. P. Pereira Arias,et al.  [Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies]. , 2010, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[26]  C. Sundaram,et al.  Global robotic experience and the type of surgical system impact the types of robotic malfunctions and their clinical consequences: an FDA MAUDE review , 2012, BJU international.

[27]  Francesco Volonté,et al.  Reliability of robotic system during general surgical procedures in a university hospital. , 2014, American journal of surgery.

[28]  J. Geiger,et al.  Innovation in surgical technology and techniques: Challenges and ethical issues. , 2015, Seminars in pediatric surgery.

[29]  J. G. P. Arias,et al.  Incidencias y complicaciones en nuestras primeras 250 prostatctomias radicales robticas , 2010 .

[30]  Chad A. LaGrange,et al.  Malfunction of the Da Vinci robotic system during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an international survey. , 2010, Journal of endourology.