Using Conceptual Spaces to Model the Dynamics of Empirical Theories

In Conceptual Spaces (Gardenfors 2000), dimensions and their relations provide a topological representation of a concept’s constituents and their mode of combination. When concepts are modeled as n-dimensional geometrical structures, conceptual change denotes the dynamic development of these structures. Following this basic assumption, we apply conceptual spaces to the dynamics of empirical theories. We show that the terms of the structuralist view of empirical theories can be largely recovered. Based on the logically possible change operations which a concept’s dimensions can undergo (singularly or in combination), we identify four types of (increasingly radical) change to an empirical theory. The incommensurability issue as well as the importance of measurement procedures for the identification of a radical theory change are briefly discussed.

[1]  Michael Lane,et al.  Introduction to structuralism , 1970 .

[2]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  Structures and Norms in Science , 1997 .

[3]  R. Disalle Understanding space-time : the philosophical development of physics from Newton to Einstein , 2006 .

[4]  W. Todd Maddox,et al.  Perceptual and decisional separability. , 1992 .

[5]  Thomas S. Kuhn,et al.  Theory-change as structure-change: Comments on the sneed formalism , 1976 .

[6]  P G rdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states , 1988 .

[7]  Measurement in Carnap's late Philosophy of Science1 , 2005 .

[8]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The Probabilistic revolution , 1987 .

[9]  Carlos Ulises Moulines,et al.  Introduction: Structuralism As A Program For Modelling Theoretical Science , 2004, Synthese.

[10]  Ulrich Gähde,et al.  Holism, Underdetermination, And The Dynamics Of Empirical Theories , 2004, Synthese.

[11]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[12]  N. T. Roseveare Mercury''s perihelion from Le Verrier to Einstein , 1982 .

[13]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States , 2008 .

[14]  Peter Brinkworth,et al.  Basic Concepts of Measurement. , 1989 .

[15]  Robert D. Melara,et al.  The concept of perceptual similarity : from psychophysics to cognitive psychology , 1992 .

[16]  Joseph D. Sneed,et al.  Structuralist Knowledge Representation: Paradigmatic Examples , 2000 .

[17]  S S Stevens,et al.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. , 1946, Science.

[18]  Wolfgang Stegmüller,et al.  The Structuralist View of Theories , 1979 .

[19]  Thomas S. Kuhn,et al.  SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS , 1982, Pediatrics.

[20]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[21]  U. Gähde Anomalies and the Revision of Theory-Elements: Notes on the Advance of Mercury’s Perihelion , 1997 .

[22]  Wolfgang Balzer,et al.  Reduction in Science , 1984 .

[23]  Wolfgang Balzer,et al.  Reduction in science : structure, examples, philosophical problems , 1984 .

[24]  Joseph D. Sneed,et al.  Structuralist Theory of Science , 1996 .

[25]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Psychophysical approaches to cognition. , 1992 .

[26]  Wolfgang Balzer,et al.  An architectonic for science , 1987 .

[27]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Introduction to Logic, Second Edition , 2013, Introduction to Logic.

[28]  Wolfgang Balzer,et al.  Structuralist theory of science : focal issues, new results , 1996 .

[29]  Xiang Chen,et al.  Why did John Herschel fail to understand polarization? The differences between object and event concepts , 2003 .

[30]  Hasok Chang,et al.  Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress , 2004 .