Torsional Resistance of Two New Heat Treated Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments: An in Vitro Evaluation

Objective:  To evaluate the difference in torsional resistance, angular deflection and fragment length between two new rotary instruments: AF Blue S4 and S-One. These files share all features except cross-sectional design.  Material and Methods: A total of 40 new Nickel-Titanium instruments of 25 mm in length were tested in this study and divided in two groups: 20 AF Blue S4, tip 25 and constant 6% taper and 20 AF-Blue S4 tip 25 and constant 6% taper. The torsional test was performed by the use of a torque recording endodontic motor (KaVo, Biberac, Germany). Torque to Fracture (TtF), Angular Deflection (AD) and Fragment Length (FL) was recorded for each instrument. To ensure an immovable block at 3mm of the instrument tip, an auto-polymerizing resin (DuraLay; Reliance Dental Mfg Co, Worth, IL) was used. Each file was rotated clockwise at a speed of 300 rpm until fracture occurred .  Results: Group A (AF Blue S4) showed higher TtF and AD than Group B (S-One), and statistical analysis found significant differences between the two instruments (p 0.05) between the two instruments .  Conclusion:  The AF Blue S4 seems to have a higher resistance to torsional stress in vitro. Clinically, the use of AF Blue S4 could be safer in narrow canals.

[1]  G. Cheung,et al.  Debris extrusion during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium instruments using liquid and gel formulations of sodium hypochlorite in vitro. , 2020, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[2]  Alessandro Mazzoni,et al.  Torque Range, a New Parameter to Evaluate New and Used Instrument Safety , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[3]  Dario Di Nardo,et al.  Centering Ability of a New Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments with a Peculiar Flat-side Design: An In Vitro Study. , 2020, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[4]  A. Elnaghy,et al.  Dynamic cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of TruNatomy compared with different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. , 2020, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[5]  C. Dörfer,et al.  A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols , 2020, PeerJ.

[6]  C. Virgillito,et al.  Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments according to the Angle of File Access and Radius of Root Canal. , 2020, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  M. Unal,et al.  Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of hyflex EDM, vortex blue, protaper gold, and onecurve nickel–Titanium instruments , 2020, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[8]  G. Bolelli,et al.  Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used reciproc blue and reciproc. , 2020, International endodontic journal.

[9]  V. Buono,et al.  Torsional behaviour of Reciproc and Reciproc blue instruments associated to their martensitic transformation temperatures. , 2019, International endodontic journal.

[10]  Seok-Woo Chang,et al.  Torsional and Bending Properties of V Taper 2H, ProTaper NEXT, NRT, and One Shape , 2019, BioMed research international.

[11]  M. Versiani,et al.  In Vivo Evaluation of Operative Torque Generated by Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments during Root Canal Preparation , 2019, European Journal of Dentistry.

[12]  C. Keskin,et al.  Torsional Resistance of ProGlider, Hyflex EDM, and One G Glide Path Instruments. , 2019, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  L. Testarelli,et al.  Role of the Flat-Designed Surface in Improving the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic NiTi Rotary Instruments , 2019, Materials.

[14]  L. Testarelli,et al.  Differences in cyclic fatigue lifespan between two different heat treated NiTi endodontic rotary instruments: WaveOne Gold vs EdgeOne Fire , 2019, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[15]  L. Laino,et al.  Effects of Hot Sterilization on Torsional Properties of Endodontic Instruments: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis , 2019, Materials.

[16]  A. Jamleh,et al.  Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems , 2019, BMC Oral Health.

[17]  Ritika Malhotra,et al.  Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique - Invitro study. , 2019, Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research.

[18]  L. Testarelli,et al.  A comparative study of mechanical resistance of two reciprocating files , 2019, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[19]  L. Testarelli,et al.  Measurement of torque generated during intracanal instrumentation in vivo , 2018, International endodontic journal.

[20]  L. Testarelli,et al.  Fatigue Resistance of New and Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: a Comparative Study. , 2018, La Clinica terapeutica.

[21]  Seok-Woo Chang,et al.  Cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional resistance, and metallurgical characteristics of M3 Rotary and M3 Pro Gold NiTi files , 2018, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[22]  A. Keleş,et al.  Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold Reciprocating Instruments , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  Hyeon-Cheol Kim,et al.  Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium files with a similar cross-section , 2017, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[24]  M. Cristalli,et al.  Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes. , 2017, Annali di stomatologia.

[25]  Asgeir Sigurdsson,et al.  Effect from Rotational Speed on Torsional Resistance of the Nickel‐titanium Instruments , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  Hyeon-Cheol Kim,et al.  The Effects of Torsional Preloading on the Torsional Resistance of Nickel‐titanium Instruments , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[27]  L. Testarelli,et al.  The Influence of a New Clinical Motion for Endodontic Instruments on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain. , 2017, La Clinica terapeutica.

[28]  H. Arslan,et al.  Effect of movement kinematics on the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[29]  Lavanya Anumula,et al.  Do NiTi instruments show defects before separation? Defects caused by torsional fatigue in hand and rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments which lead to failure during clinical use. , 2012, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[30]  A. Versluis,et al.  Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[31]  WooCheol Lee,et al.  Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[32]  Bock Hur,et al.  Torsional strength and toughness of nickel-titanium rotary files. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[33]  Bock Hur,et al.  Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[34]  J. Gomes,et al.  Influence of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of K3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments. , 2007 .

[35]  O. Peters,et al.  Effect of immersion in sodium hypochlorite on torque and fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[36]  Marcos Cesar Pimenta de Araújo,et al.  Influence of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of K3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments. , 2007, Journal of Endodontics.

[37]  C. Pameijer,et al.  Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[38]  M. dos Santos,et al.  Cervical shaping in curved root canals: comparison of the efficiency of two endodontic instruments. , 2002, Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research.

[39]  H H Messer,et al.  Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.