Endogeneity in survey research

Abstract Endogeneity is a crucial problem in survey-based empirical research on marketing strategy (MS) and inter-organizational relationships (IORs); if not addressed, it can cause researchers to arrive at flawed conclusions and to offer poor advice to practitioners. Although the field is increasingly cognizant of endogeneity-related issues, many authors fail to properly address it, particularly in survey-based research. Emphasizing the role of essential heterogeneity, this article develops an overarching framework to help improve the understanding of endogeneity problems and how to tackle them when researchers use cross-sectional survey-based data. The authors provide explanations of and advice for how MS and IOR researchers can address six “painful” and sometimes hidden decisions: 1) Do you have an endogeneity problem? 2) What technique/estimator is appropriate? 3) What instrumental variables (IVs) should be chosen? 4) How should IVs be evaluated empirically? 5) How should the results be interpreted and evaluated? and 6) What results should you report? The authors provide a practical flowchart to guide researchers in their efforts to address endogeneity-related concerns.

[1]  T. Cornelissen,et al.  From LATE to MTE: Alternative Methods for the Evaluation of Policy Interventions , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Lung-fei Lee Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables , 1978 .

[3]  Christopher F. Baum,et al.  Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing , 2003 .

[4]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[5]  David F. Larcker,et al.  On the Use of Instrumental Variables in Accounting Research , 2008 .

[6]  T. Haavelmo,et al.  The Probability Approach in Econometrics , 1944 .

[7]  Angus Deaton Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development , 2010 .

[8]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[9]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Frugal IV alternatives to identify the parameter for an endogenous regressor , 2009 .

[10]  John E. Garen,et al.  The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable , 1984 .

[11]  J. Sargan THE ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS USING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES , 1958 .

[12]  R. Rohh ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS An Overview , 2001 .

[13]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[14]  Philippe Jacquart,et al.  On making causal claims: A review and recommendations , 2010 .

[15]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[16]  Scott A. Brave,et al.  Estimating Marginal Treatment Effects using Parametric and Semiparametric Methods , 2014 .

[17]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Instrumental Variables Methods for the Correlated Random Coefficient Model: Estimating the Average Rate of Return to Schooling When the Return is Correlated with Schooling , 1998 .

[18]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[19]  Richard Startz,et al.  The Distribution of the Instrumental Variables Estimator and its T-Ratiowhen the Instrument is a Poor One , 1988 .

[20]  S. Haugland,et al.  Strategic Performance Effects of Misaligned Formal Contracting: The Mediating Role of Relational Contracting , 2015 .

[21]  D. Roodman Fitting Fully Observed Recursive Mixed-process Models with cmp , 2011 .

[22]  J. Heckman Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply , 1974 .

[23]  G. Bascle Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research , 2008 .

[24]  J. Heckman,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data: Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions , 1985 .

[25]  Wayne A. Fuller,et al.  Some Properties of a Modification of the Limited Information Estimator , 1977 .

[26]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[27]  J. Wooldridge Instrumental variables estimation of the average treatment effect in the correlated random coefficient model , 2008 .

[28]  Marcelo J. Moreira A Conditional Likelihood Ratio Test for Structural Models , 2003 .

[29]  Edward Vytlacil,et al.  Estimating Marginal Returns to Education , 2010, The American economic review.

[30]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Solving and Testing for Regressor-Error (in)Dependence When no Instrumental Variables are Available: With New Evidence for the Effect of Education on Income , 2005 .

[31]  J. Heckman,et al.  Testing the Correlated Random Coefficient Model , 2009, Journal of econometrics.

[32]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[33]  Olav Reiersöl,et al.  Confluence analysis by means of instrumental sets of variables , 1945 .

[34]  R. D. Blander A simple estimator for the correlated random coefficient model , 2010 .

[35]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Weak Instruments: Diagnosis and Cures in Empirical Econometrics , 2003 .

[36]  C. Nelson,et al.  The Distribution of the Instrumental Variables Estimator and its T-Ratiowhen the Instrument is a Poor One , 1988 .

[37]  Matthew Semadeni,et al.  The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: : Understanding through simulations , 2014 .

[38]  J. Angrist,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects , 1995 .

[39]  J. Wooldridge Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics , 2015, The Journal of Human Resources.

[40]  James H. Stock,et al.  The Other Transformation in Econometric Practice: Robust Tools for Inference , 2010 .

[41]  J. Wooldridge On two stage least squares estimation of the average treatment effect in a random coefficient model , 1997 .

[42]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Microeconometrics Using Stata , 2009 .

[43]  David Card Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems , 2000 .

[44]  K. Sudhir,et al.  Forecasting Marketing-Mix Responsiveness for New Products , 2010 .

[45]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  The Chief Marketing Officer Matters! , 2015 .

[46]  J. S. Silva,et al.  A cautionary note on tests of overidentifying restrictions , 2012 .

[47]  Philip G. Wright,et al.  The tariff on animal and vegetable oils , 1928 .

[48]  J. Angrist,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 15, Number 4—Fall 2001—Pages 69–85 Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments , 2022 .

[49]  L. Hansen Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators , 1982 .

[50]  J. Angrist,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects , 1994 .

[51]  Sungho Park,et al.  Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[52]  James J Heckman,et al.  Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[53]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Selectivity Problems in Quasi-Experimental Studies , 1983 .

[54]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-selection , 1987 .

[55]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Estimating treatment effects for discrete outcomes when responses to treatment vary: an application to Norwegian vocational rehabilitation programs , 2005 .

[56]  J. Wooldridge Further results on instrumental variables estimation of average treatment effects in the correlated random coefficient model , 2003 .

[57]  Magne Mogstad,et al.  Beyond LATE with a Discrete Instrument , 2017, Journal of Political Economy.

[58]  C. Moorman,et al.  Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines , 2008 .

[59]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[60]  Peter E. Rossi Invited Paper - Even the Rich Can Make Themselves Poor: A Critical Examination of IV Methods in Marketing Applications , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[61]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments , 2002 .

[62]  StataCorp Stata structural equation modeling reference manual , 2011 .

[63]  M. Frölich Parametric and Nonparametric Regression in the Presence of Endogenous Control Variables , 2008 .

[64]  Michael P. Murray Avoiding Invalid Instruments and Coping with Weak Instruments , 2006 .

[65]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .