Effect of neighboring cells on cell stiffness measured by optical tweezers indentation

Abstract. We report on the modification of mechanical properties of breast cancer cells when they get in contact with other neighboring cells of the same type. Optical tweezers vertical indentation was employed to investigate cell mechanics in isolated and contact conditions, by setting up stiffness as a marker. Two human breast cancer cell lines with different aggressiveness [MCF-7 (luminal breast cancer) and MDA-MB-231 (basal-like breast cancer)] and one normal immortalized breast cell line HBL-100 (normal and myoepithelial) were selected. We found that neighboring cells significantly alter cell stiffness: MDA-MB-231 becomes stiffer when in contact, while HBL-100 and MCF-7 exhibit softer character. Cell stiffness was probed at three cellular subregions: central (above nucleus), intermediate (cytoplasm), and near the leading edge. In an isolated condition, all cells showed a significant regional variation in stiffness: higher at the center and fading toward the leading edge. However, the regional variation becomes statistically insignificant when the cells were in contact with other neighboring cells. The proposed approach will contribute to understand the intriguing temporal sequential alterations in cancer cells during interaction with their surrounding microenvironment.

[1]  William C Hines,et al.  Why don't we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[2]  C. Porta,et al.  The role of the cell–cell interactions in cancer progression , 2015, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[3]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Can cancer be reversed by engineering the tumor microenvironment? , 2008, Seminars in cancer biology.

[4]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[7]  D. Peeper,et al.  Metastasis mechanisms. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  M. S. Yousafzai,et al.  Investigation into local cell mechanics by atomic force microscopy mapping and optical tweezer vertical indentation , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[9]  G. Charras,et al.  The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material , 2013, Nature materials.

[10]  Dong Sun,et al.  Applying Combined Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy Technologies to Manipulate Cell Adhesions for Cell-to-Cell Interaction Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Sarah Hitch,et al.  THE CHRONOLOGY OF EARLY EPIC , 2014, The Classical Review.

[12]  M. Roizen,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2012 .

[13]  Thomas Risler,et al.  Focus on the physics of cancer , 2015, 1505.04271.

[14]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  Dong Sun,et al.  Manipulating cell adhesions with optical tweezers for study of cell-to-cell interactions. , 2013, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[16]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Physically based principles of cell adhesion mechanosensitivity in tissues , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[17]  M. Hendzel,et al.  Mechanotransduction from the ECM to the genome: Are the pieces now in place? , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[18]  Nobue Itasaki,et al.  Dynamic and influential interaction of cancer cells with normal epithelial cells in 3D culture , 2014, Cancer Cell International.

[19]  Javier Tamayo,et al.  Effect of Actin Organization on the Stiffness of Living Breast Cancer Cells Revealed by Peak-Force Modulation Atomic Force Microscopy. , 2016, ACS nano.

[20]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Metastatic cancer cells tenaciously indent impenetrable, soft substrates , 2013 .

[21]  A. Elias,et al.  Multistep tumorigenesis and the microenvironment , 2004, Breast Cancer Research.

[22]  Kai Bodensiek,et al.  Cell Visco-Elasticity Measured with AFM and Optical Trapping at Sub-Micrometer Deformations , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Brenton D Hoffman,et al.  Cell mechanics: dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[24]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Mechanotransduction gone awry , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  Claudia Tanja Mierke,et al.  The fundamental role of mechanical properties in the progression of cancer disease and inflammation , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[26]  T. Soussi,et al.  Epithelial HBL-100 cell line derived from milk of an apparently healthy woman harbours SV40 genetic information. , 1985, Experimental cell research.

[27]  J. Massagué,et al.  Cancer Metastasis: Building a Framework , 2006, Cell.

[28]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[29]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Mismatch in mechanical and adhesive properties induces pulsating cancer cell migration in epithelial monolayer. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Roger T. Bonnecaze,et al.  Modeling the Mechanics of Cancer: Effect of Changes in Cellular and Extra-Cellular Mechanical Properties , 2013, Front. Oncol..

[31]  Milan Makale,et al.  Cellular mechanobiology and cancer metastasis. , 2007, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[32]  Keith Bonin,et al.  The effect of neighboring cells on the stiffness of cancerous and non-cancerous human mammary epithelial cells , 2014 .

[33]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Interference model for back-focal-plane displacement detection in optical tweezers. , 1998, Optics letters.

[34]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  Nataliia Guz,et al.  If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[36]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[37]  R. Jain,et al.  Micro-Environmental Mechanical Stress Controls Tumor Spheroid Size and Morphology by Suppressing Proliferation and Inducing Apoptosis in Cancer Cells , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Substrate-dependent cell elasticity measured by optical tweezers indentation , 2016 .

[39]  Viola Vogel,et al.  The Yin-Yang of Rigidity Sensing: How Forces and Mechanical Properties Regulate the Cellular Response to Materials , 2013 .

[40]  Qi Wen,et al.  Effects of non-linearity on cell-ECM interactions. , 2013, Experimental cell research.

[41]  John W Haycock,et al.  3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[42]  Peter T C So,et al.  Cell stiffness and receptors: evidence for cytoskeletal subnetworks. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.