Sampling of Probability Measures in the Convex Order and Approximation of Martingale Optimal Transport Problems

Motivated by the approximation of Martingale Optimal Transport problems, we study sampling methods preserving the convex order for two probability measures $\mu$ and $\nu$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$, with $\nu$ dominating $\mu$. When $(X_i)_{1\le i\le I}$ (resp. $(Y_j)_{1\le j\le J}$) are i.i.d. according $\mu$ (resp. $\nu$), the empirical measures $\mu_I$ and $\nu_J$ are not in the convex order. We investigate modifications of $\mu_I$ (resp. $\nu_J$) smaller than $\nu_J$ (resp. greater than $\mu_I$) in the convex order and weakly converging to $\mu$ (resp. $\nu$) as $I,J\to\infty$. In dimension 1, according to Kertz and R\"osler (1992), the set of probability measures with a finite first order moment is a lattice for the increasing and the decreasing convex orders. From this result, we can define $\mu\vee\nu$ (resp. $\mu\wedge\nu$) that is greater than $\mu$ (resp. smaller than $\nu$) in the convex order. We give efficient algorithms permitting to compute $\mu\vee\nu$ and $\mu\wedge\nu$ when $\mu$ and $\nu$ are convex combinations of Dirac masses. In general dimension, when $\mu$ and $\nu$ have finite moments of order $\rho\ge 1$, we define the projection $\mu\curlywedge_\rho \nu$ (resp. $\mu\curlyvee_\rho\nu$) of $\mu$ (resp. $\nu$) on the set of probability measures dominated by $\nu$ (resp. larger than $\mu$) in the convex order for the Wasserstein distance with index $\rho$. When $\rho=2$, $\mu_I\curlywedge_2 \nu_J$ can be computed efficiently by solving a quadratic optimization problem with linear constraints. It turns out that, in dimension 1, the projections do not depend on $\rho$ and their quantile functions are explicit, which leads to efficient algorithms for convex combinations of Dirac masses. Last, we illustrate by numerical experiments the resulting sampling methods that preserve the convex order and their application to approximate Martingale Optimal Transport problems.

[1]  Gabriel Peyré,et al.  Iterative Bregman Projections for Regularized Transportation Problems , 2014, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  R. Taylor A User's Guide to Measure-Theoretic Probability , 2003 .

[3]  Filippo Santambrogio,et al.  Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians , 2015 .

[4]  J. Shanthikumar,et al.  Multivariate Stochastic Orders , 2007 .

[5]  Mathias Beiglböck,et al.  Model-independent bounds for option prices—a mass transport approach , 2011, Finance Stochastics.

[6]  Prasad Tetali,et al.  Characterization of a class of weak transport-entropy inequalities on the line , 2015, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques.

[7]  A. Guillin,et al.  On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure , 2013, 1312.2128.

[8]  David Hobson,et al.  ROBUST BOUNDS FOR FORWARD START OPTIONS , 2012 .

[9]  M. Beiglbock,et al.  On a problem of optimal transport under marginal martingale constraints , 2012, 1208.1509.

[10]  Nizar Touzi,et al.  An explicit martingale version of the one-dimensional Brenier theorem , 2016, Finance Stochastics.

[11]  N. Juillet Stability of the shadow projection and the left-curtain coupling , 2014, 1407.8009.

[12]  Gilles Pagès,et al.  Optimal quadratic quantization for numerics: the Gaussian case , 2003, Monte Carlo Methods Appl..

[13]  R. P. Kertz,et al.  Stochastic and convex orders and lattices of probability measures, with a martingale interpretation , 1992 .

[14]  ALFRED MÜLLER,et al.  Stochastic Order Relations and Lattices of Probability Measures , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[15]  Gilles Pagès,et al.  Intrinsic Stationarity for Vector Quantization: Foundation of Dual Quantization , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[16]  P. Meyer,et al.  Probabilities and potential C , 1978 .

[17]  Gaoyue Guo,et al.  Computational methods for martingale optimal transport problems , 2017, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[18]  B. David Martingales with specified marginals , 2012 .

[19]  G. Bouchitté,et al.  A new class of costs for optimal transport planning , 2018, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[20]  R. P. Kertz,et al.  Complete lattices of probability measures with applications to martingale theory , 2000 .

[21]  Paul-Marie Samson,et al.  Kantorovich duality for general transport costs and applications , 2014, 1412.7480.

[22]  V. Strassen The Existence of Probability Measures with Given Marginals , 1965 .

[23]  J. Darroch,et al.  Generalized Iterative Scaling for Log-Linear Models , 1972 .

[24]  L. Ambrosio,et al.  Gradient Flows: In Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures , 2005 .