Machine learning approach to muon spectroscopy analysis

In recent years, artificial intelligence techniques have proved to be very successful when applied to problems in physical sciences. Here we apply an unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithm called principal component analysis (PCA) as a tool to analyse the data from muon spectroscopy experiments. Specifically, we apply the ML technique to detect phase transitions in various materials. The measured quantity in muon spectroscopy is an asymmetry function, which may hold information about the distribution of the intrinsic magnetic field in combination with the dynamics of the sample. Sharp changes of shape of asymmetry functions—measured at different temperatures—might indicate a phase transition. Existing methods of processing the muon spectroscopy data are based on regression analysis, but choosing the right fitting function requires knowledge about the underlying physics of the probed material. Conversely, PCA focuses on small differences in the asymmetry curves and works without any prior assumptions about the studied samples. We discovered that the PCA method works well in detecting phase transitions in muon spectroscopy experiments and can serve as an alternative to current analysis, especially if the physics of the studied material are not entirely known. Additionally, we found out that our ML technique seems to work best with large numbers of measurements, regardless of whether the algorithm takes data only for a single material or whether the analysis is performed simultaneously for many materials with different physical properties.

[1]  E. Mitchell,et al.  Muon Spin Rotation Spectroscopy Principles and Applications in Solid State Physics , 1985 .

[2]  T. Yamazaki,et al.  Zero-and low-field spin relaxation studied by positive muons , 1979 .

[3]  Campbell,et al.  Dynamics in canonical spin glasses observed by muon spin depolarization. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[4]  Lord,et al.  Probing the Spin-Spin Dynamical Autocorrelation Function in a Spin Glass above Tg via Muon Spin Relaxation. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[5]  David J. Schwab,et al.  A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists , 2018, Physics reports.

[6]  Luke,et al.  Muon diffusion and spin dynamics in copper. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[7]  Ke Liu,et al.  Identification of emergent constraints and hidden order in frustrated magnets using tensorial kernel methods of machine learning , 2019, Physical Review B.

[8]  E. Cussen,et al.  Muon Spectroscopy for Investigating Diffusion in Energy Storage Materials , 2020 .

[9]  R. Kubo A stochastic theory of spin relaxation , 1981 .

[10]  Sebastian Johann Wetzel,et al.  Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: from principal component analysis to variational autoencoders , 2017, Physical review. E.

[11]  S. Cox Implanted muon studies in condensed matter science , 1987 .

[12]  Thomas E. Potok,et al.  A bridge for accelerating materials by design , 2015 .

[13]  R. Cywinski,et al.  Nonunitary triplet pairing in the centrosymmetric superconductor LaNiGa2. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[14]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.

[15]  S. Ghosh,et al.  Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking , 2020, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[16]  K. Syu,et al.  The antipressure effect of Cu on Tc in superconducting La(Ni1−xCux)C2 (0≤x≤0.25) , 2008 .

[17]  R. Cywinski,et al.  Muon science : muons in physics, chemistry, and materials : proceedings of the fifty first Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, St Andrews, August 1998 , 2017 .

[18]  J. Quintanilla,et al.  Principal Component Analysis of Diffuse Magnetic Scattering: a Theoretical Study , 2020 .

[19]  R. Cywinski,et al.  Evidence for time-reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor LaNiC2. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[20]  A. Frenkel,et al.  Structure and Physical Properties of the Layered Iron Oxychalcogenide BaFe2Se2O , 2012, 1206.5788.

[21]  E. Cussen,et al.  Na1.5La1.5TeO6: Na+ conduction in a novel Na-rich double perovskite. , 2018, Chemical communications.

[22]  A. Hillier,et al.  Spin interactions and magnetic order in the iron oxychalcogenides BaFe2Q2O(Q=Sand Se) , 2019, Physical Review B.

[23]  James Theiler,et al.  Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design , 2016, Nature Communications.

[24]  S. Huber,et al.  Learning phase transitions by confusion , 2016, Nature Physics.

[25]  R. Renzi,et al.  Muon contact hyperfine field in metals: A DFT calculation , 2018, 1803.11099.

[26]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Machine learning in electronic-quantum-matter imaging experiments , 2018, Nature.

[27]  Jun Sugiyama,et al.  Li diffusion in LixCoO2 probed by muon-spin spectroscopy. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[28]  A. Drew,et al.  Muon spin spectroscopy: magnetism, soft matter and the bridge between the two , 2014 .

[29]  Stephen Jesse,et al.  Machine learning–enabled identification of material phase transitions based on experimental data: Exploring collective dynamics in ferroelectric relaxors , 2018, Science Advances.

[30]  Alexandra Nagy,et al.  Variational Quantum Monte Carlo Method with a Neural-Network Ansatz for Open Quantum Systems. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[31]  Y. Uemura μSR relaxation functions in magnetic materials , 2017 .

[32]  B. D. Conduit,et al.  Design of a nickel-base superalloy using a neural network , 2017, ArXiv.

[33]  G. C. Stirling Muon spin rotation , 1978, Nature.

[34]  Juan Carrasquilla,et al.  Machine learning quantum phases of matter beyond the fermion sign problem , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Lenka Zdeborová,et al.  New tool in the box , 2017, Nature Physics.

[36]  Lei Wang,et al.  Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning , 2016, 1606.00318.

[37]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Neural-network quantum state tomography , 2018 .

[38]  Jorge Cadima,et al.  Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Machine learning phases of matter , 2016, Nature Physics.

[40]  M. Nicklas,et al.  Two-Gap Superconductivity in LaNiGa_{2} with Nonunitary Triplet Pairing and Even Parity Gap Symmetry. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[41]  Shivani Sharma,et al.  μSR and neutron diffraction studies on the tuning of spin-glass phases in the partially ordered double perovskites SrMn1−xWxO3 , 2018, Physical Review B.

[42]  Yamazaki,et al.  Quantum diffusion of positive muons in copper. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[43]  Aurélien Géron,et al.  Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems , 2017 .

[44]  Lenka Zdeborová,et al.  Understanding deep learning is also a job for physicists , 2020, Nature Physics.

[45]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Machine learning and the physical sciences , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[46]  A. Amato,et al.  Spin Liquid State in the 3D Frustrated Antiferromagnet PbCuTe_{2}O_{6}: NMR and Muon Spin Relaxation Studies. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[47]  Wenjian Hu,et al.  Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[48]  K. Nagamine,et al.  μ+ diffusion in copper studied by zero field μSR , 1984 .

[49]  K. Miyake,et al.  Intrinsic Angular Momentum and Intrinsic Magnetic Moment of Chiral Superconductor on Two-Dimensional Square Lattice , 2015, 1508.06702.

[50]  E. Cussen,et al.  Fast microwave-assisted synthesis of Li-stuffed garnets and insights into Li diffusion from muon spin spectroscopy† , 2016 .

[51]  N. Regnault,et al.  Variational Neural-Network Ansatz for Steady States in Open Quantum Systems. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[52]  Nobuyuki Yoshioka,et al.  Constructing neural stationary states for open quantum many-body systems , 2019, Physical Review B.

[53]  Michael J. Hartmann,et al.  Neural-Network Approach to Dissipative Quantum Many-Body Dynamics. , 2019, Physical review letters.