An integrated statistical approach for evaluating the exceedence of criteria pollutants in the ambient air of megacity Delhi

Like many countries, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Delhi, in India evaluates exceedences of air pollution levels against the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). One of the mandatory requirements for NAAQS compliance is that the probability of non-exceedence should be at least 0.98, meaning that the formulated framework of NAAQS is essentially statistical. The current practice for assessing the compliance criterion is based on simple computation of the count of number of exceedences in a given year, without giving any consideration to the distribution function followed by different pollutants in the ambient air. This becomes even more important for monitoring stations where continuous monitoring is not done for all 365 days, but assessment is based on a minimum sample of 104 readings recorded in a year. The proper method for evaluating the compliance is the foreknowledge of the population distribution and computation of non-exceedence (or exceedence) probability of NAAQS from the probability density function (pdf). The study proposes an integrated and scientifically robust methodology that is generic in nature and could well be used for assessing the air quality compliance criteria laid out by the NAAQS for India, besides suggesting percent reduction in source emissions to those pollutants that exceed the NAAQS. The usefulness of proposed methodology is exhibited by a case study conducted on four criteria air pollutants – sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), suspended particulate matter (SPM), and particulate matter less 10 micron in size (PM10) – monitored in the ambient air of megacity Delhi at six monitoring stations. The collected data at all these sites underwent statistical analysis for the: (i) identification and estimation of the best-fit distributions, (ii) computation of probability of exceedence of the NAAQS for the non-complying pollutants, (iii) determination of return period of NAAQS violation, and (iv) estimation of percentage source emission reduction to meet the NAAQS criteria for the non-complying pollutants using the statistical rollback theory. It was concluded that the knowledge of pdf is a basic and essential requirement for realistically evaluating the compliance of NAAQS.

[1]  David T. Mage Pseudo-Lognormal Distributions , 1984 .

[2]  Joseph M. Prospero,et al.  Aerosol concentration statistics for the Northern Tropical Atlantic , 1977 .

[3]  Sukumar Devotta,et al.  Health risks of NO2, SPM and SO2 in Delhi (India) , 2005 .

[4]  J H Seinfeld,et al.  On frequency distributions of air pollutant concentrations. , 1976, Atmospheric environment.

[5]  Panos G. Georgopoulos,et al.  Statistical distributions of air pollutant concentrations , 1982 .

[6]  R. Harrison,et al.  Particles, air quality, policy and health. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[7]  Yu-Pin Lin,et al.  Remote Sensing Data with the Conditional Latin Hypercube Sampling and Geostatistical Approach to Delineate Landscape Changes Induced by Large Chronological Physical Disturbances , 2008, Sensors.

[8]  Stuart A Batterman,et al.  Reproducibility and imputation of air toxics data. , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[9]  Wayne R. Ott,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS and DATA ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[10]  Willibald Loiskandl,et al.  Using sequential Gaussian simulation to assess the field-scale spatial uncertainty of soil water content , 2009 .

[11]  Amit Garg,et al.  Pro-equity Effects of Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Policies: A Case Study of Human Health Impacts of Outdoor Air Pollution in New Delhi , 2011 .

[12]  Joseph M. Prospero,et al.  Nitrate, non-sea-salt sulfate, and mineral aerosol over the northwestern Indian Ocean , 1987 .

[13]  Bai-You Cheng,et al.  Combining a finite mixture distribution model with indicator kriging to delineate and map the spatial patterns of soil heavy metal pollution in Chunghua County, central Taiwan. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[14]  Thomas E. Graedel The Wind Boxplot: An Improved Wind Rose , 1977 .

[15]  Noel de Nevers,et al.  Rollback Modeling: Basic and Modified , 1975 .

[16]  Chunrong Jia,et al.  Distributions of personal VOC exposures: a population-based analysis. , 2008, Environment international.

[17]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Statistical distributions for air pollution applied to the study of the particulate problem in Santiago , 1999 .

[18]  Hone-Jay Chu,et al.  Identifying spatial mixture distributions of PM2.5 and PM10 in Taiwan during and after a dust storm , 2012 .

[19]  A S Kao,et al.  Frequency Distributions of PM10 Chemical Components and Their Sources. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Ilias Mavroidis,et al.  Compliance with the annual NO2 air quality standard in Athens. Required NOx levels and expected health implications , 2008 .

[21]  Nor Azam Ramli,et al.  Modelling of PM10 concentration for industrialized area in Malaysia: A case study in Shah Alam , 2011 .

[22]  Zoran Mijić,et al.  The statistical characters of PM10 in Belgrade area , 2009 .

[23]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Estimation and discrimination of alternative air pollution models , 1992 .

[24]  Wayne R. Ott,et al.  An evaluation of the methods of fractiles, moments and maximum likelihood for estimating parameters when sampling air quality data from a stationary lognormal distribution , 1984 .

[25]  R. Larsen,et al.  A mathematical model for relating air quality measurements to air quality standards , 1971 .

[26]  R I Larsen,et al.  A new mathematical model of air pollutant concentration averaging time and frequency. , 1969, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association.

[27]  G Kurchatova,et al.  A study of the statistical distribution of chemical pollutants in air. , 1976, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association.

[28]  R I LARSEN,et al.  A method for determining source reduction required to meet air quality standards. , 1961, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association.

[29]  Mark A. Sutton,et al.  Ammonia concentrations at a site in Southern Scotland from 2 yr of continuous measurements , 1998 .

[30]  Hsin-Chung Lu,et al.  The statistical characters of PM10 concentration in Taiwan area , 2002 .

[31]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Applied Statistics for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 2008 .

[32]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Air pollution at a hotspot location in Delhi : Detecting trends, seasonal cycles and oscillations , 2007 .

[33]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Modeling distributions of air pollutant concentrations—III. The hybrid deterministic-statistical distribution approach , 1988 .

[34]  Prashant Kumar,et al.  Field comparison of cyclonic separator and mass inertial impactor for PM10 monitoring , 2012 .

[35]  Adam Hadley,et al.  Assessing changes to the probability distribution of sulphur dioxide in the UK using a lognormal model , 2003 .

[36]  Giovanni Lonati,et al.  The duration of PM10 concentration in a large metropolitan area , 2011 .