The Effect of Cover Geometry on the Productivity of a Modified Solar Still Desalination Unit

Abstract Desalination methods based on renewable energy offer a promising solution to both water shortage and environmental degradation problems that continue to grow globally. The solar still is one such method that uses a sustainable energy source to produce potable water albeit at a relatively low productivity rate. A new modification has been introduced to the conventional solar still to enhance its productivity. The modification consists of a light weight, black finished, slowly-rotating drum, which leads to a sustainable, cost-effective, and low-tech amendment that preserves the key features of the still while considerably increasing its yield compared to a control still that does not include the drum. In this paper, three different cover geometries of the modified still are studied and the effect of cover design on the performance of the still in terms of measured temperatures and productivity is considered. The three cover designs are as follows: double-sloped or triangular, single-sloped and curved cover. In addition, a conventional double-sloped still without the rotating drum is operated in parallel as a control and the findings of this study are reported and discussed.

[1]  M. Reali,et al.  Solar stills made with tubes for sea water desalting , 2008 .

[2]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Performance evaluation of a solar still by using the concept of solar fractionation , 2004 .

[3]  A. Harmim,et al.  Parametric study of a vertical solar still under desert climatic conditions , 2004 .

[4]  Naresh K. Dhiman,et al.  Transient analysis of a spherical solar still , 1988 .

[5]  A. A. El-Sebaii,et al.  Thermal performance of a triple-basin solar still , 2005 .

[6]  Salah Abdallah,et al.  Sun tracking system for productivity enhancement of solar still , 2008 .

[7]  A. K. Singh,et al.  Optimization of Orientation for Higher Yield of Solar Still for a given Location , 1995 .

[8]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Monthly comparative performance of solar stills of various designs , 1987 .

[9]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Optimization of collector and basin areas for a higher yield for active solar stills , 1998 .

[10]  K. Kalidasa Murugavel,et al.  Progresses in improving the effectiveness of the single basin passive solar still , 2008 .

[11]  George M. Ayoub,et al.  Developments in Solar Still Desalination Systems: A Critical Review , 2012 .

[12]  Yasser Fathi Nassar,et al.  The second generation of the solar desalination systems , 2007 .

[13]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Transient analysis of a double slope-double basin solar distiller , 1991 .

[14]  Hassan E.S. Fath,et al.  Thermal-economic analysis and comparison between pyramid-shaped and single-slope solar still configurations , 2003 .

[15]  B. A. Jubran,et al.  Parametric investigation of a double-effect solar still in comparison with a single-effect solar still , 2002 .

[16]  Ali M. El-Nashar,et al.  Solar Thermal Processes , 2009 .

[17]  Hiroshi Tanaka,et al.  One step azimuth tracking tilted-wick solar still with a vertical flat plate reflector , 2009 .

[18]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Optimization of number of effects for higher yield from an inverted absorber solar still using the Runge-Kutta method , 1998 .

[19]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Improved design of a double effect solar still , 1993 .

[20]  Basel I. Ismail,et al.  Design and performance of a transportable hemispherical solar still , 2009 .

[21]  Hiroshi Tanaka,et al.  Numerical analysis of the vertical multiple-effect diffusion solar still coupled with a flat plate reflector: optimum reflector angle and optimum orientation of the still at various seasons and locations , 2007 .

[22]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Parametric study of an inverted absorber double-effect solar distillation system , 1997 .

[23]  G. N. Tiwari,et al.  Monthly performance of passive and active solar stills for different Indian climatic conditions , 2004 .