Improving the Positioning Accuracy of a Neurosurgical Robot System

This paper discusses the overall positioning accuracy of a neurosurgical robot system. First, the overall positioning accuracy of the robot system is analyzed and formulated. Then, the efforts are focused on improving the positioning accuracy of the robot arm. A revised Denavit--Hartenberg (D-K) kinematic model is addressed to describe two nearly parallel joint axes for the calibration of the robot. The joint transmitting error of the robot is compensated by using a backpropagation (BP) neural network. Finally, the absolute positioning accuracy of the robot arm is measured. A phantom is designed to simulate the clinical workflow of the robot-assisted neurosurgery for measuring the overall positioning accuracy of the robot system. The results show that the positioning error of the robot arm is less than 1 mm, which is comparable to that of stereotactic frames; and that the overall positioning error of the robot system is caused mainly by target registration error, which proves the effectiveness of our efforts.

[1]  S. Hayati,et al.  A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Q Li,et al.  Robotics in neurosurgery: state of the art and future technological challenges , 2004, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[3]  J. Ziegert,et al.  Basic considerations for robot calibration , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Mark Holden,et al.  Detection and correction of geometric distortion in 3D MR images , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  R. Sibson.  Studies in the Robustness of Multidimensional Scaling: Perturbational Analysis of Classical Scaling , 1979 .

[6]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Weimin Shen,et al.  Robotic neurosurgery and clinical applications , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings..

[8]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Paul S. Morgan,et al.  The application accuracy of the PathFinder neurosurgical robot , 2003, CARS.

[10]  Abhilash Pandya,et al.  The application accuracy of the NeuroMate robot--A quantitative comparison with frameless and frame-based surgical localization systems. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[11]  Tianmiao Wang,et al.  Neuromaster: a robot system for neurosurgery , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[12]  E. Micheli-Tzanakou,et al.  Effect of the number of external markers in multimodal 3-D image registration , 1993, 1993 IEEE Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference.

[13]  R. Maciunas,et al.  Interactive image-guided neurosurgery , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Kam S. Tso,et al.  Robot geometry calibration , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  R Perez,et al.  Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system-a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and flashpoint tracking systems. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.