Neural correlates of the spacing effect in explicit verbal semantic encoding support the deficient‐processing theory

Spaced presentations of to‐be‐learned items during encoding leads to superior long‐term retention over massed presentations. Despite over a century of research, the psychological and neural basis of this spacing effect however is still under investigation. To test the hypotheses that the spacing effect results either from reduction in encoding‐related verbal maintenance rehearsal in massed relative to spaced presentations (deficient processing hypothesis) or from greater encoding‐related elaborative rehearsal of relational information in spaced relative to massed presentations (encoding variability hypothesis), we designed a vocabulary learning experiment in which subjects encoded paired‐associates, each composed of a known word paired with a novel word, in both spaced and massed conditions during functional magnetic resonance imaging. As expected, recall performance in delayed cued‐recall tests was significantly better for spaced over massed conditions. Analysis of brain activity during encoding revealed that the left frontal operculum, known to be involved in encoding via verbal maintenance rehearsal, was associated with greater performance‐related increased activity in the spaced relative to massed condition. Consistent with the deficient processing hypothesis, a significant decrease in activity with subsequent episodes of presentation was found in the frontal operculum for the massed but not the spaced condition. Our results suggest that the spacing effect is mediated by activity in the frontal operculum, presumably by encoding‐related increased verbal maintenance rehearsal, which facilitates binding of phonological and word level verbal information for transfer into long‐term memory. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. W. Melton Repetition and retrieval from memory. , 1967, Science.

[2]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[3]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[4]  Landauer Tk Reinforcement as consolidation. , 1969 .

[5]  T. Landauer Reinforcement as consolidation. , 1969, Psychological review.

[6]  D. Rundus Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. , 1971 .

[7]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. , 1974 .

[8]  R. L. Solso Theories in cognitive psychology : the Loyola symposium , 1975 .

[9]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. , 1980 .

[10]  L. Jacoby,et al.  When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects , 1982 .

[11]  I.S.P. Nation,et al.  Beginning to Learn Foreign Vocabulary: A Review of the Research , 1982 .

[12]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. , 1988 .

[13]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[15]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Human Memory: Paradigms and Paradoxes , 1992 .

[16]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect , 1993 .

[17]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[18]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[19]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  M. E. Raichle,et al.  PET Studies of Auditory and Phonological Processing: Effects of Stimulus Characteristics and Task Demands , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Knight Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection , 1996, Nature.

[22]  S E Petersen,et al.  A positron emission tomography study of the short-term maintenance of verbal information , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  A R McIntosh,et al.  The neural correlates of intentional learning of verbal materials: a PET study in humans. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[25]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[26]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Bandettini The temporal resolution of Functional MRI , 1999 .

[28]  H G Wieser,et al.  Human hippocampus associates information in memory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[30]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Lila Davachi,et al.  When Keeping in Mind Supports Later Bringing to Mind: Neural Markers of Phonological Rehearsal Predict Subsequent Remembering , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Novelty-related activation within the medial temporal lobes , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  L. Davachi,et al.  Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: insights from relational and item-based learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  A Meta-analysis of the Spacing Effect in Verbal Learning: Implications for Research on Advertising Repetition and Consumer Memory , 2003 .

[35]  G. Rainer,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory–auditory/orosensory internal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us About the Mind? , 2004 .

[38]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  Language-Related Activations in the Left Prefrontal Regions Are Differentially Modulated by Age, Proficiency, and Task Demands , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  R. Todd Constable,et al.  Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates , 2005, NeuroImage.

[40]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Practice and Forgetting Effects on Vocabulary Memory: An Activation-Based Model of the Spacing Effect , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  Paul C. Locasto,et al.  A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing , 2005, NeuroImage.

[42]  P. Hagoort On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[45]  J. Kwon,et al.  Distinct processing of facial emotion of own-race versus other-race , 2008, Neuroreport.

[46]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Medial Temporal Lobe Activity Predicts Successful Relational Memory Binding , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Positive and negative modulation of word learning by reward anticipation , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[48]  B. Ross The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory , 2010 .