Portable blood gas and electrolyte analyzer evaluated in a multiinstitutional study.

A recently introduced blood gas/electrolyte analyzer (SenDx 100((R)), renamed ABL70) intended for point-of-care, near-patient, or stat laboratory use was evaluated simultaneously in four different institutions and compared with three different laboratory bench analyzers with respect to imprecision, inaccuracy (assessed by tonometry), and patient-sample analyses. The analyzer is equipped with a sensor cassette and a reagent cartridge for 50, 100, or 200 analyses and 100 or more traditional quality-control measurements. One analysis requires 170 microL of whole blood and takes <90 s. Statistically, the instrument performed somewhat better (lower CVs) for PO2 and potassium and somewhat worse for pH, PCO2, and ionized calcium than the respective comparison analyzers. However, the overall performance (in terms of CV and accuracy) was satisfactory in terms of clinical (e.g., CLIA '88) goals in all institutions. The mean difference and the CV of that difference in some 400 patient-sample comparisons were as follows: 0.010 (+/- 0.002%) for pH, -0.65 mmHg (+/- 4%) for PCO2, -0.49 mmHg (+/- 6%) for Po2, 0.44 mmol/L (+/- 1.2%) for sodium, -0.013 mmol/L (+/- 2.9%) for potassium, -0.016 mmol/L (+/- 2.6%) for ionized calcium, and -0.016 L/L (+/- 7. 1%) for the hematocrit. Its acceptable analytical performance and ease of operation make the SenDx 100 suitable for the analysis of blood gases and electrolytes.

[1]  S. Ehrmeyer,et al.  1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass. , 1990, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  C G Fraser,et al.  Proposed quality specifications for the imprecision and inaccuracy of analytical systems for clinical chemistry. , 1992, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[4]  W. Bablok,et al.  A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I , 1983, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[5]  The evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in the emergency department. , 1993, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  L. Sarkozi,et al.  Analytical evaluation of i-STAT Portable Clinical Analyzer and use by nonlaboratory health-care professionals. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  P Wilding,et al.  Evaluation of a novel point-of-care system, the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  D. Seligson,et al.  Clinical Chemistry , 1965, Bulletin de la Societe de chimie biologique.

[9]  O. Müller-Plathe,et al.  Stability of Blood Gases, Electrolytes and Haemoglobin in Heparinized Whole Blood Samples: Influence of the Type of Syringe , 1992, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[10]  O. Müller-Plathe,et al.  Evaluierung des tragbaren i-STAT Blutgas-Elektrolyt-Analysensystems. Evaluation of the i-STAT Portable Blood Gas and Electrolyte Analyzer , 1997 .

[11]  G. Hortin,et al.  Analytical artifacts in hematocrit measurements by whole-blood chemistry analyzers. , 1995, Clinical chemistry.