THE RESPONSES OF LIMULUS OPTIC NERVE FIBERS TO PATTERNS OF ILLUMINATION ON THE RECEPTOR MOSAIC

The inhibition that is exerted mutually among receptor units (ommatidia) of the compound eye of Limulus is less for units widely separated than for those close together. This diminution of inhibition with distance is the resultant of two factors: (1) the threshold of inhibitory action increases with increasing distance between the units involved; and (2) the coefficient of inhibitory action decreases with increasing distance. The discharge of nerve impulses from ommatidia at various distances from one another may be described quantitatively by a set of simultaneous linear equations which express the excitatory effects of the illumination on each ommatidium and the inhibitory interactions between each ommatidium and its neighbors. The values of the thresholds and coefficients of inhibitory action, which appear as parameters in these equations, must be determined empirically: their dependence on distance is somewhat irregular and cannot yet be expressed in an exact general law. Nevertheless the diminution of inhibitory influences with distance is sufficiently uniform that patterns of neural response generated by various patterns of illumination on the receptor mosaic can be predicted qualitatively. Such predictions have been verified experimentally for two simple patterns of illumination: an abrupt step in intensity, and a simple gradient between two levels of intensity (the so-called Mach pattern). In each case, transitions in the pattern of illumination are accentuated in the corresponding pattern of neural response.

[1]  R. Beitel Inhibition of Threshold Excitation in the Human Eye , 1936 .

[2]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF OPTIC NERVE FIBERS , 1940 .

[3]  R. Galamboš INHIBITION OF ACTIVITY IN SINGLE AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS BY ACOUSTIC STIMULATION , 1944 .

[4]  G. Fry Mechanisms subserving simultaneous brightness contrast. , 1948, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  H. Barlow Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  INHIBITORY INTERACTION OF RECEPTOR UNITS IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[8]  H. Barlow,et al.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  SPATIAL SUMMATION OF INHIBITORY INFLUENCES IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS, AND THE MUTUAL INTERACTION OF RECEPTOR UNITS , 1958, The Journal of general physiology.

[10]  G. Békésy,et al.  Funneling in the Nervous System and its Role in Loudness and Sensation Intensity on the Skin , 1958 .

[11]  W. H. Miller,et al.  FINE STRUCTURE OF SOME INVERTEBRATE PHOTORECEPTORS , 1958, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  W. H. Miller,et al.  NEURAL INTERACTION IN THE EYE AND THE INTEGRATION OF RECEPTOR ACTIVITY , 1958, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.