When workflows will not deliver: The case of contradicting work practice

A new class of problems has been identified for workflow management wherein this technology imposes an additional overhead on users which is not adequately compensated by the benefits gained. Multiple observations from real cases identify a contradiction between the preferred work practice and some fundamental principles behind workflow systems. The focus of this paper is primarily to motivate the problem, however, we will also provide deliberations on the impact of these advanced process requirements on existing technology solutions.

[1]  Stefan Jablonski,et al.  MOBILE: A Modular Workflow Model and Architecture , 1994 .

[2]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  From Office Automation to Intelligent Workflow Systems , 1995, IEEE Expert.

[4]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  Workflow driven e-learning beyond collaborative environments , 2002 .

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Exterminating the Dynamic Change Bug: A Concrete Approach to Support Workflow Change , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[6]  児玉 文雄 Harvard Business Review : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[7]  Luciano Baresi,et al.  WIDE workflow development methodology , 1999, WACC.

[8]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  Customizing Internal Activity Behaviour for Flexible Process Enforcement , 2004, ADC.

[9]  Calton Pu,et al.  ActivityFlow: Towards Incremental Specification and Flexible Coordination of Workflow Activities , 1997, ER.

[10]  Alexander L. Wolf,et al.  Proceedings of the international joint conference on Work activities coordination and collaboration , 1999 .

[11]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Adeptflex—Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control , 1998, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[12]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  A general model for nested transactional workflows , 1996 .

[13]  J NuttGary,et al.  Office Information Systems and Computer Science , 1980 .

[14]  Jacques Wainer,et al.  WorkFlow systems: a few definitions and a few suggestions , 1995, COCS '95.

[15]  Andreas Geppert,et al.  Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration , 1999, Proceedings Fourth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. CoopIS 99 (Cat. No.PR00384).

[16]  Bartosz Kiepusewski,et al.  Expressiveness and suitability of languages for control flow modelling in workflows , 2003 .

[17]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Office Information Systems and Computer Science , 1980, CSUR.