Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method

Observers reported which of as many as eight computer-generated approaching objects would “hit” them first. Accuracy was above chance probability except when two-object displays contained pictorial relative size information that contradicted relative time-to-contact (TTC) information. Mean d’ and response time was greater, but mean efficiency (Barlow, 1978) was smaller with eight objects than with two. Performance was less effective when global expansion contradicted TTC information than when local expansion contradicted TTC. Results suggest that observers can judge relative TTC with as many as eight objects when certain sources of information are consistent with TTC and that observers rely on information other than, or in conjunction with, optical TTC. Also, the sources of visual information that affect performance may vary with set size, and identification (but not detection) judgments may be constrained by limited-capacity processing.

[1]  D. Regan.  The divergence of velocity and visual processing. , 1993, Perception.

[2]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[3]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays , 1986 .

[4]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[5]  ADAPTATION AND POP-OUT IN THE ANALYSIS OF DIVERGENCE-SENSITIVE MECHANISMS , 1993 .

[6]  W H Teichner,et al.  Visual search for simple targets. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[8]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Tresilian.  Perceptual Information for the Timing of Interceptive Action , 1990, Perception.

[11]  F. Previc,et al.  Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[15]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[16]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  B. Frost,et al.  Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons , 1992, Nature.

[19]  R J Jagacinski,et al.  Quantifying the cognitive trajectories of extrapolated movements. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .

[23]  G J Andersen,et al.  Active control in interrupted dynamic spatial orientation: The detection of orientation change , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[26]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Readings in mathematical psychology , 1963 .

[28]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[29]  J. Palmer.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shared attentional control of smooth eye movement and perception , 1986, Vision Research.

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[32]  J. Tresilian.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[34]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Patricia R. Delucia,et al.  Effects of Pictorial Relative Size and Ground-Intercept Information on Judgments about Potential Collisions in Perspective Displays , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Irwin Pollack.  Message Probability and Message Reception , 1963 .

[38]  O. Braddick,et al.  Serial Search for Targets Defined by Divergence or Deformation of Optic Flow , 1991, Perception.

[39]  Norma Graham,et al.  Detection and identification of spatial frequency: models and data , 1984, Vision Research.

[40]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  The ability to reason about movement in the visual field , 1988 .

[41]  W. Simpson,et al.  Depth Discrimination from Optic Flow , 1988, Perception.

[42]  M. Kaiser,et al.  Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. , 1993 .

[43]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention in visual search: Multiple search classes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  N. Cowan.  Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[47]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[48]  R J Bootsma,et al.  Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  I. Pollack.  Message Uncertainty and Message Reception , 1959 .

[50]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.