Differential impact of partial cortical blindness on gaze strategies when sitting and walking – An immersive virtual reality study

The present experiments aimed to characterize the visual performance of subjects with long-standing, unilateral cortical blindness when walking in a naturalistic, virtual environment. Under static, seated testing conditions, cortically blind subjects are known to exhibit compensatory eye movement strategies. However, they still complain of significant impairment in visual detection during navigation. To assess whether this is due to a change in compensatory eye movement strategy between sitting and walking, we measured eye and head movements in subjects asked to detect peripherally-presented, moving basketballs. When seated, cortically blind subjects detected ∼80% of balls, while controls detected almost all balls. Seated blind subjects did not make larger head movements than controls, but they consistently biased their fixation distribution towards their blind hemifield. When walking, head movements were similar in the two groups, but the fixation bias decreased to the point that fixation distribution in cortically blind subjects became similar to that in controls - with one major exception: at the time of basketball appearance, walking controls looked primarily at the far ground, in upper quadrants of the virtual field of view; cortically blind subjects looked significantly more at the near ground, in lower quadrants of the virtual field. Cortically blind subjects detected only 58% of the balls when walking while controls detected ∼90%. Thus, the adaptive gaze strategies adopted by cortically blind individuals as a compensation for their visual loss are strongest and most effective when seated and stationary. Walking significantly alters these gaze strategies in a way that seems to favor walking performance, but impairs peripheral target detection. It is possible that this impairment underlies the experienced difficulty of those with cortical blindness when navigating in real life.

[1]  S. Leat,et al.  Visual impairment and the useful field of vision , 2006, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual information from the lower visual field is important for walking across multi-surface terrain , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  John G. Buckley,et al.  Visuomotor control of step descent: evidence of specialised role of the lower visual field , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Patla,et al.  “Look where you’re going!”: gaze behaviour associated with maintaining and changing the direction of locomotion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Jon Currie,et al.  Homonymous Visual Field Defects and Stroke in an Older Population , 2002, Stroke.

[7]  D. Ballard,et al.  Memory Representations in Natural Tasks , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  S K Mannan,et al.  Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  Eli Peli,et al.  Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator. , 2009, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[10]  N. Newman,et al.  Homonymous hemianopias , 2006, Neurology.

[11]  C. Freksa,et al.  “Starkfest” Vision and Clinic Science Special Issue: Short‐Term Adaptation of Eye Movements in Patients with Visual Hemifield Defects Indicates High Level Control of Human Scanpath , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Adaptive Gaze Control in Natural Environments , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Zihl,et al.  Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Gerard Obrecht,et al.  ADAPTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF EYE-HEAD COORDINATION WITH DEGRADED PERIPHERAL VISION (*) , 1987 .

[15]  G. Kerkhoff Restorative and compensatory therapy approaches in cerebral blindness - a review. , 1999, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[16]  E. Peli,et al.  Eye movements of patients with tunnel vision while walking. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  J D Crawford,et al.  Primate head-free saccade generator implements a desired (post-VOR) eye position command by anticipating intended head motion. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  D. Williams,et al.  Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia , 1997 .

[19]  References , 1971 .

[20]  Karen Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  The coordination of eye, head, and hand movements in a natural task , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Stahl,et al.  Amplitude of human head movements associated with horizontal saccades , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  J. Stahl,et al.  Eye-head coordination and the variation of eye-movement accuracy with orbital eccentricity , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M G Harris,et al.  Is Optic Flow Used to Guide Walking While Wearing a Displacing Prism? , 2001, Perception.

[25]  E. Peli,et al.  Heading Perception in Patients with Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Understanding the contribution of binocular vision to the control of adaptive locomotion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  D. Williams,et al.  Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia. III. The completion phenomenon; insight and attitude to the defect; and visual functional efficiency. , 1963, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  H. Hildebrandt,et al.  Visual search and visual target detection in patients with infarctions of the left or right posterior or the right middle brain artery. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[29]  D. Williams,et al.  Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopial II. Oculomotor mechanisms. , 1963, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Control of attention and gaze in complex environments. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[31]  F. Chédru,et al.  Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[32]  N. Newman,et al.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. , 2006, Neurology.

[33]  Francesca C. Fortenbaugh,et al.  The effect of peripheral visual field loss on representations of space: evidence for distortion and adaptation. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  Kathleen A. Turano,et al.  Optic-flow and egocentric-direction strategies in walking: Central vs peripheral visual field , 2005, Vision Research.

[35]  W. McIlroy,et al.  Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  P B Sandor,et al.  Tracking with a restricted field of view: performance and eye-head coordination aspects. , 1991, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[37]  L. Stark,et al.  Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[38]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans: an anticipatory synergy , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Eye movements during visual search: the costs of choosing the optimal path , 2001, Vision Research.

[40]  Beatriz Muñoz,et al.  Cognitive and vision loss affects the topography of the attentional visual field. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  Hiroshi Tsukagoshi,et al.  Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect , 1987, Neuropsychologia.