Reassessing Priorities in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complicated by Cardiac Arrest.

[1]  Chiu-Hsieh Hsu,et al.  Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Combining Mechanical Chest Compressions and Percutaneous LV Assistance. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Unloading the Left Ventricle Before Reperfusion in Patients With Anterior ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot Study Using the Impella CP , 2019, Circulation.

[3]  K. Alaswad,et al.  Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  K. Kern,et al.  Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In and On the Way to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. , 2016, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[5]  R. Walker,et al.  quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical hest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to ut-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation , 2015 .

[6]  David Dai,et al.  Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  I. Palacios,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROTECT II Study , 2012, Circulation.