Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.

Householders' response to weight-based billing for the collection of household waste was investigated with the aim of providing decision support for waste management policies. Three questions were addressed: How much and what kind of information on weight-based billing is discernible in generic Swedish waste collection statistics? Why do local authorities implement weight-based billing, and how do they perceive the results? and, Which strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing have been observed on the local level? The study showed that municipalities with pay-by-weight schemes collected 20% less household waste per capita than other municipalities. Surprisingly, no part of this difference could be explained by higher recycling rates. Nevertheless, the majority of waste management professionals were convinced that recycling had increased as a result of the billing system. A number of contradicting strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing were revealed.

[1]  Vincent Linderhof,et al.  Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the Oostzaan case , 2001 .

[2]  Jan Reichenbach,et al.  Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe - a review of pilot research and implementation studies. , 2008, Waste management.

[3]  Paula Vicente,et al.  Factors influencing households' participation in recycling , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[4]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Management of household bulky waste in England , 2007 .

[5]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .

[7]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Household Willingness to Recycle Electronic Waste , 2006 .

[8]  Christer Berglund,et al.  The assessment of households' recycling costs: The role of personal motives , 2006 .

[9]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR , 1998 .

[10]  Pilar L González-Torre,et al.  Influence of distance on the motivation and frequency of household recycling. , 2005, Waste management.

[11]  Anders Lagerkvist,et al.  Integrerat transportsystem för källsorterat hushållsavfall , 1984 .

[12]  Anthony John Griffiths,et al.  Key factors in household recycling behaviour in an expanding kerbside recycling scheme , 2003 .

[13]  Marta Batllevell,et al.  The fairness of PAYT systems: some guidelines for decision-makers. , 2008, Waste management.

[14]  Anders Lagerkvist,et al.  Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden. , 2007, Waste management.

[15]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Monetary incentives and environmental concern. Effects of a differentiated garbage fee , 1994 .

[16]  Victor Corral-Verdugo,et al.  DUAL ‘REALITIES’ OF CONSERVATION BEHAVIOR: SELF-REPORTS VS OBSERVATIONS OF RE-USE AND RECYCLING BEHAVIOR , 1997 .

[17]  Olle Hage,et al.  The economics of household packaging waste : norms, effectiveness and policy design , 2008 .

[18]  Bernd Bilitewski,et al.  From traditional to modern fee systems. , 2008, Waste management.

[19]  Kathleen Barker,et al.  Comparison of Self-Reported Recycling Attitudes and Behaviors with Actual Behavior , 1994 .

[20]  Christer Berglund,et al.  Burning in moral, drowning in rationality? - Ethical considerations in forming environmental policy , 2005 .

[21]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Monetary Incentives and Recycling: Behavioural and Psychological Reactions to a Performance-Dependent Garbage Fee , 2003 .

[22]  C. Vlek,et al.  Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior , 2002 .

[23]  L. Skumatz,et al.  Pay as you throw in the US: implementation, impacts, and experience. , 2008, Waste management.

[24]  Florence Lansana Margai Promotional Strategies for the Prevention and Proper-Disposal of Household Hazardous Wastes , 1999 .

[25]  Helena Shanahan,et al.  Towards sound environmental behaviour: Exploring household participation in waste management , 1996 .

[26]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Household Behavior Under Alternative Pay-As- You-Throw Systems for Solid Waste Disposal , 1999 .

[27]  P. Stern Information, Incentives, and Proenvironmental Consumer Behavior , 1999 .

[28]  Philip H. Byer,et al.  EFFECT OF DESIGN VARIABLES ON PARTICIPATION IN RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAMS , 1997 .

[29]  Darren Perrin,et al.  Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: a review of two kerbside recycling schemes , 2001 .

[30]  Adam D. Read,et al.  Recycling behaviour in a London Borough: Results from large-scale household surveys , 2005 .

[31]  Carol Diggelman,et al.  Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question , 2003, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[32]  T. Sterner,et al.  Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting , 1999 .