Ideological versus Downsian political competition

Abstract. We analyze a one-dimensional model of spatial political competition with two parties and uncertainty on the distribution of voters' types. We assume that parties are formed by regular members and professional politicians; members care about the policy enacted, while professional politicians, on the contrary, care only about winning the election. We consider two possibilities: that members choose the political platforms and that professional politicians are the ones who choose such platforms. The expected utility for party members is analyzed under these two cases. We find that when professional politicians have no informational advantage, it is on the interest of both parties to let professional politicians choose the platforms. Only in the case in which professional politicians have much better information than the members of the party about voters is it possible that party members obtain a greater expected utility choosing the platforms themselves rather than letting the professional politicians choose.

[1]  D. Wittman Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[2]  A. Alesina Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters , 1988 .

[3]  R. Calvert Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence* , 1985 .

[4]  Political–economic equilibrium when parties represent constituents: The unidimensional case , 1997 .

[5]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Reconsidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition , 1975 .

[6]  Ingemar Hansson,et al.  Voting competitions with interested politicians: Platforms do not converge to the preferences of the median voter , 1984 .

[7]  J. Roemer A theory of policy differentiation in single issue electoral politics , 1994 .

[8]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions , 1987 .

[9]  J. Pratt Concavity of the Log Likelihood , 1981 .

[10]  Richard E. Barlow,et al.  Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Probability Models , 1976 .

[11]  Steven M. Slutsky,et al.  Multi-agent equilibria with market share and ranking objectives , 1985 .

[12]  Martin J. Osborne,et al.  Spatial Models of Political Competition under Plurality Rule: A Survey of Some Explanations of the Number of Candidates and the Positions They Take , 1995 .

[13]  H. Rosenthal,et al.  A Theory of Divided Government , 1996 .

[14]  D. Wittman Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting: Spatial Strategies When Candidates Have Policy Preferences , 1990 .

[15]  A. Downs An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[16]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Aggregation and Social Choice: A Mean Voter Theorem , 1991 .

[17]  O. Swank Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy , 1996 .