Laboratory screening of connective tissue diseases by a new automated ENA screening assay (EliA Symphony) in clinically defined patients.
暂无分享,去创建一个
José M González-Buitrago | Concepción González | Ó. Herráez | Belén García-Berrocal | Marta Pérez | José A Navajo | Oscar Herraez | Marta Pérez | Concepción González | J. Navajo | J. González-Buitrago | B. García‐Berrocal
[1] Nicola Bizzaro,et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Elisa Methods as an Alternative Screening Test to Indirect Immunofluorescence for the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies. Evaluation of Five Commercial Kits , 2004, Autoimmunity.
[2] Anne-Marie Rouquette,et al. Evaluation of the new multiplexed immunoassay, FIDIS, for simultaneous quantitative determination of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.
[3] Concepción González,et al. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) screening by enzyme immunoassay with nuclear HEp-2 cell extract and recombinant antigens: analytical and clinical evaluation. , 2002, Clinical biochemistry.
[4] S. Kondo,et al. Detection of antinuclear antibodies by use of an enzyme immunoassay with nuclear HEp-2 cell extract and recombinant antigens: comparison with immunofluorescence assay in 307 patients. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.
[5] X. Bossuyt. Evaluation of Two Automated Enzyme Immunoassays for Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies , 2000, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[6] Ulvestad,et al. Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Antinuclear Antibodies in Rheumatological Practice , 2000, Scandinavian journal of immunology.
[7] P. Kern,et al. Measurement of Antinuclear Antibodies: Assessment of Different Test Systems , 2000, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.
[8] O. Rekvig,et al. Screening tests for antinuclear antibodies (ANA): selective use of central nuclear antigens as a rational basis for screening by ELISA. , 1999, Journal of autoimmunity.
[9] F. Spertini,et al. Multicenter evaluation study on a new HEp2 ANA screening enzyme immune assay. , 1999, Journal of autoimmunity.
[10] N. Goel,et al. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay to an indirect fluorescent immunoassay for the detection of antinuclear antibodies. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.
[11] J. Koziol,et al. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassays for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. I. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[12] G. Jacob,et al. Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[13] P. Fox,et al. Comparison of antinuclear antibody testing methods by ROC analysis with reference to disease diagnosis. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.
[14] D. Stites,et al. Comparison of antinuclear antibody testing methods: immunofluorescence assay versus enzyme immunoassay , 1997, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.
[15] R. Maini,et al. Manual of Biological Markers of Disease , 1996, Springer Netherlands.
[16] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.
[17] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .
[18] O. Rekvig,et al. Antinuclear antibody screening in this new millennium: farewell to the microscope? , 2001, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.
[19] R. Humbel,et al. Detection of antinuclear antibodies by immunofluorescence , 1996 .