Fostering individual creativity in startups: comprehensive performance measurement systems, role clarity and strategic flexibility

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of comprehensive performance measurement systems (PMS), role clarity and strategic flexibility on the individual creativity of founders/managers of startups. Design/methodology/approach The research population comprises 611 Brazilian startups in the e-commerce, retail and wholesale segments. One owner/manager of each startup was contacted by the survey, obtaining 91 valid responses. For data analysis, symmetric and asymmetric techniques were applied, respectively: partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Findings The findings show that the comprehensive PMS is an important predictor of individual creativity, role clarity and strategic flexibility. Role clarity has a direct effect on creativity and promotes partial mediation between comprehensive PMS and creativity. Comprehensive PMS and role clarity are of great importance and have high performance in favor of creativity, while strategic flexibility has high performance, but is of low importance. Several causal combinations promote high individual creativity. Practical implications It offers founders/managers an insight into the aspects that are worth of efforts to foster individual creativity in their startup. Originality/value The key contribution of the study is that the comprehensive PMS, which includes financial, non-financial and other measures for product and process innovation, can directly and indirectly (through role clarity) influence individual creativity.

[1]  Antonio Dávila,et al.  The Valuation of Management Control Systems in Start-Up Companies: International Field-Based Evidence , 2014 .

[2]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[3]  J. Riepe,et al.  Startups’ demand for non-financial resources: Descriptive evidence from an international corporate venture capitalist , 2020 .

[4]  Viraiyan Teeroovengadum,et al.  Influence of organisational factors on the effectiveness of performance management systems in the public sector , 2019, European Business Review.

[5]  Jozée Lapierre,et al.  Creativity and Work Environment in a High-Tech Context , 2003 .

[6]  Sven Siverbo,et al.  Effects of performance measurement system inconsistency on managers’ role clarity and well-being , 2018, Scandinavian Journal of Management.

[7]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  S. Kundu,et al.  Effects of perceived role clarity on innovative work behavior: a multiple mediation model , 2019, RAUSP Management Journal.

[9]  Kevin Baird,et al.  The Role of Strategic Flexibility in The Associations between Management Control System Characteristics and Strategic Change , 2016 .

[10]  R. Chenhall,et al.  The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control , 2015 .

[11]  Breda Sweeney,et al.  Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms , 2019, Accounting, Organizations and Society.

[12]  Dietmar Grichnik,et al.  Sources of strategic flexibility in new ventures: An analysis of the role of resource leveraging practices , 2019, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[13]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems , 2016 .

[14]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[15]  L. Beh,et al.  Measuring and enhancing organisational creative climate, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior in startups development , 2019, The Bottom Line.

[16]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[17]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Cheng-Feng Cheng,et al.  How balance theory explains high-tech professionals' solutions of enhancing job satisfaction , 2014 .

[19]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[20]  Gary L. Frazier,et al.  The Severity of Contract Enforcement in Interfirm Channel Relationships , 2001 .

[21]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[22]  Itzhak David Simão Kaveski,et al.  Influência dos sistemas de controle gerencial e da criatividade sobre o desempenho no trabalho , 2020 .

[23]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[24]  S. Widener,et al.  Creativity and Control: A Paradox. Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework , 2017 .

[25]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM , 2019, Australasian Marketing Journal.

[26]  A. Woodside.  Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[27]  Soenke Sievers,et al.  The Relevance of Financial versus Non-Financial Information for the Valuation of Venture Capital-Backed Firms , 2012 .

[28]  J. Sawyer.  Goal and Process Clarity: Specification of Multiple Constructs of Role Ambiguity and a Structural Equation Model of Their Antecedents and Consequences , 1992 .

[29]  M. Mura,et al.  Executing strategy through comprehensive performance measurement systems , 2017 .

[30]  Li Yuan,et al.  Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product innovation , 2010 .

[31]  Lucía Muñoz-Pascual,et al.  Entrepreneurial capital leveraging innovation in micro firms: A mixed-methods perspective , 2021, Journal of Business Research.

[32]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Accounting and Control, Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Venturing into New Research Opportunities , 2009 .

[33]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility , 2001 .

[34]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed , 2007 .

[35]  Xin Liang,et al.  Strategic flexibility, innovative HR practices, and firm performance: A moderated mediation model , 2017 .

[36]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[37]  Thi Thu Hien Nguyen,et al.  Effect of transformational-leadership style and management control system on managerial performance , 2017 .

[38]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[39]  Ricardo Rodrigues,et al.  Management control systems in high-tech start-ups: An empirical investigation , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[40]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making , 2000 .

[41]  S. Su,et al.  How does interactive use of budgets affect creativity? , 2020 .

[42]  Kevin Baird,et al.  The effectiveness of strategic performance measurement systems , 2017 .

[43]  Ranjith Appuhami.  Exploring the Relationship between Strategic Performance Measurement Systems and Managers' Creativity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Organisational Learning , 2019 .

[44]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[45]  C. Lau.  Nonfinancial and financial performance measures: How do they affect employee role clarity and performance? , 2011 .

[46]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  How Top Management Teams Use Management Accounting Systems to Implement Strategy , 2006 .

[47]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  Realising the richness of psychology theory in contingency-based management accounting research , 2016 .

[48]  Jean-François Henri.  ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[49]  Carly Moulang,et al.  Performance Measurement System Use in Generating Psychological Empowerment and Individual Creativity , 2015 .

[50]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs , 2020 .

[51]  Julen Castillo Apraiz,et al.  The role of competitive strategy in the performance impact of exploitation and exploration quality management practices , 2020, European Business Review.

[52]  Dirceu da Silva,et al.  SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato , 2019, Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa.

[53]  Lorenzo Lucianetti,et al.  Contemporary Performance Measurement Systems: A Review of Their Consequences and a Framework for Research , 2012 .

[54]  Xiaobo Wu,et al.  Proactive and reactive strategic flexibility in coping with environmental change in innovation , 2013 .

[55]  Kevin Baird,et al.  The impact of management control systems on organisational change and performance in the public sector , 2019, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.

[56]  Heng Liu,et al.  Strategic Flexibility and International Venturing by Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Effects of Institutional and Relational Factors , 2013 .

[57]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance , 2008 .

[58]  Juil Kim,et al.  The Effect of Managerial Characteristics on the Performance of Technology-Based Start-ups in Korea , 2019, International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness.

[59]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[60]  R. Chenhall.  Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study , 2005 .

[61]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century , 1998 .

[62]  Barbara Vis,et al.  The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses , 2012 .

[63]  Danilo Brozovic,et al.  Strategic Flexibility: A Review of the Literature , 2018 .

[64]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[65]  Marina Dabic,et al.  Importance-Performance Analysis: Common Misuse of a Popular Technique , 2016 .

[66]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[67]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[68]  I. Beuren,et al.  Influence of management control systems and creativity on job performance , 2020, Cadernos EBAPE.BR.

[69]  Ricardo Rodrigues,et al.  The adoption of management control systems by start-ups: Internal factors and context as determinants , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[70]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  When the Recipe Is More Important Than the Ingredients , 2014 .

[71]  Habib Mahama,et al.  The Effect of Managers' Enabling Perceptions on Costing System Use, Psychological Empowerment, and Task Performance , 2013 .

[72]  Sascha Kraus,et al.  Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method , 2017, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.

[73]  Sajad Rezaei,et al.  Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at SMEs using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and PLS path modeling , 2017 .