Effects of sprayer operating parameters on airborne drift from citrus air-carrier sprayers

Florida citrus is mostly sprayed with various types of air-carrier sprayers. These sprayers differ substantially in design features and are normally operated at different volume rates and ground speeds, during day and night applications.  The main objective of this study was to characterize drift potential (not total drift) of several commonly used citrus sprayers when operated under typical application conditions (different operating variables).  Drift potential of the applications was assessed by capturing samples of airborne spray droplets with two high-volume air samplers, positioned above tree canopies at two sides of the spray course.  For most applications, higher spray volumes (larger droplets) showed significantly reduced drift potential than lower volumes. Higher ground speed appeared to have more drift potential compared to lower speed but the effect of speed was not significant. Nozzles with comparatively lower flow rates (smaller droplets) were generally more drift-prone than the ones with higher flow rates (larger droplets) and spray from the upper nozzle bank had higher drift potential than spray from lower nozzles. These results are comparative and could show the importance of optimizing spray variables to reduce drift from typical citrus applications. Keywords: s pray drift, spray volume rate, sprayer ground speed, air sampler, fluorometry

[1]  R. D. Fox,et al.  Downwind Residue From Air Spraying Of A Dwarf Apple Orchard , 1990 .

[2]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  EFFECT OF OSCILLATORS ON DEPOSITION CHARACTERISTICS OF AN AIRBLAST SPRAYER , 1991 .

[3]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Spray Drift From Ground and Aerial Applications , 1992 .

[4]  M. Salyani,et al.  Adjuvants to Reduce Drift from Handgun Spray Applications , 1993 .

[5]  L. F. Bouse.  Effect of Nozzle Type and Operation on Spray Droplet Size , 1994 .

[6]  G. Pergher,et al.  The Effect of Spray Application Rate and Airflow Rate on Foliar Deposition in a Hedgerow Vineyard , 1995 .

[7]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Air and Spray Distribution from an Air-carrier Sprayer , 1996 .

[8]  H. Ganzelmeier,et al.  The International (BCPC) spray classification system including a drift potential factor , 1998 .

[9]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  DROP SPECTRA FOR PNEUMATIC ATOMIZERS AT LOW DISCHARGE RATES , 1998 .

[10]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  SPRAY VARIABLE EFFECTS ON ABSCISSION OF ORANGE FRUIT FOR MECHANICAL HARVESTING , 2000 .

[11]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Coverage and Drift Produced by Air Induction and Conventional Hydraulic Nozzles Used for Orchard Applications , 2000 .

[12]  Ryszard Hołownicki,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Variation of Spray Deposit and Loss with Air-jet Directions applied in Orchards , 2000 .

[13]  W. E. Steinke,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY EFFECTS ON PESTICIDE DRIFT FROM AN IRRIGATED ORCHARD , 2000 .

[14]  Masoud Salyani.  Methodologies for assessment of spray deposition in orchard applications. , 2000 .

[15]  Field performance measurements of axial fan orchard sprayers. , 2000 .

[16]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Classification of spray applications for driftability, to protect surface water , 2000 .

[17]  W. E. Bagley,et al.  Adjuvant effects on spray characteristics and drift potential , 2001 .

[18]  G. M. Richardson,et al.  Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 2. Effects of spray quality , 2001 .

[19]  J. D. Whitney,et al.  SPRAY DEPOSITION AND ABSCISSION EFFICACY OF CMN–PYRAZOLE IN MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF VALENCIA ORANGE , 2002 .

[20]  M Asoud.  SPRAYER AIR ENERGY DEMAND FOR SATISFACTORY SPRAY COVERAGE IN CITRUS APPLICATIONS , 2003 .

[21]  M. Salyani.  Droplet Size Affects Durability of Spray Deposits , 2003 .

[22]  J. D. Whitney,et al.  Effect of Application Techniques on Abscission Chemical Deposition and Mechanical Harvesting of `Valencia' Oranges , 2003 .

[23]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Remote Measurement of Spray Drift from Orchard Sprayers Using LIDAR , 2003 .

[24]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  AIRBORNE SPRAY COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF NYLON SCREEN , 2004 .

[25]  Paolo Marucco,et al.  A SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE MASS BALANCE OF SPRAY APPLIED TO TREE CROPS , 2005 .

[26]  J. D. Whitney,et al.  Comparison of Abscission Spray Application Practices for Mechanical Harvesting of Oranges , 2005 .

[27]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of spray drift around a sprayed field , 2006 .

[28]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Comparison of String and Ribbon Samplers in Orchard Spray Applications , 2006 .

[29]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  SPRAY DEPOSITION AND MASS BALANCE IN CITRUS ORCHARD APPLICATIONS , 2007 .

[30]  P. Balsari,et al.  A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk , 2007 .

[31]  Masoud,et al.  IMPROVING EFFICACY OF ABSCISSION SPRAYS FOR MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF ORANGES , 2008 .

[32]  N. Bjugstad,et al.  Field measurements of spray drift in strawberry. , 2009 .

[33]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  A Method for Assessing Drift Potential of a Citrus Herbicide Applicator , 2011 .

[34]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Solar and Storage Degradations of Oil- and Water-Soluble Fluorescent Dyes , 2011 .

[35]  Bradley K. Fritz,et al.  Wind Tunnel and Field Evaluation of Drift from Aerial Spray Applications with Multiple Spray Formulations , 2012 .

[36]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Effect of Atmospheric Conditions on Coverage of Fogger Applications in a Desert Surface Boundary Layer , 2012 .