Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objectives: Sepsis is a major public health concern with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenses. Early detection and antibiotic treatment of sepsis improve outcomes. However, although professional critical care societies have proposed new clinical criteria that aid sepsis recognition, the fundamental need for early detection and treatment remains unmet. In response, researchers have proposed algorithms for early sepsis detection, but directly comparing such methods has not been possible because of different patient cohorts, clinical variables and sepsis criteria, prediction tasks, evaluation metrics, and other differences. To address these issues, the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 facilitated the development of automated, open-source algorithms for the early detection of sepsis from clinical data. Design: Participants submitted containerized algorithms to a cloud-based testing environment, where we graded entries for their binary classification performance using a novel clinical utility-based evaluation metric. We designed this scoring function specifically for the Challenge to reward algorithms for early predictions and penalize them for late or missed predictions and for false alarms. Setting: ICUs in three separate hospital systems. We shared data from two systems publicly and sequestered data from all three systems for scoring. Patients: We sourced over 60,000 ICU patients with up to 40 clinical variables for each hour of a patient’s ICU stay. We applied Sepsis-3 clinical criteria for sepsis onset. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 104 groups from academia and industry participated, contributing 853 submissions. Furthermore, 90 abstracts based on Challenge entries were accepted for presentation at Computing in Cardiology. Conclusions: Diverse computational approaches predict the onset of sepsis several hours before clinical recognition, but generalizability to different hospital systems remains a challenge.

[1]  K. Wood,et al.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[2]  Christopher W Seymour,et al.  Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[3]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[4]  E. Crouser,et al.  Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States—An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level* , 2018, Critical care medicine.

[5]  C. Georgescu,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis: 2008-2012. , 2016, Journal of critical care.

[6]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU , 2017, Critical care medicine.

[7]  Barbara E. Engelhardt,et al.  An Optimal Policy for Patient Laboratory Tests in Intensive Care Units , 2018, PSB.

[8]  D. Angus,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis , 2013, Virulence.

[9]  P. Pronovost,et al.  A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Arise The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand. , 2007, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[12]  Theodore J Iwashyna,et al.  Improving Sepsis Treatment by Embracing Diagnostic Uncertainty. , 2019, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[13]  T. Rea,et al.  Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[14]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[15]  Mohammed Saeed,et al.  Reducing false alarm rates for critical arrhythmias using the arterial blood pressure waveform , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  Adil Rafiq Rather,et al.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) , 2015 .

[17]  G. Clermont,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[18]  G. Escobar,et al.  The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis , 2017, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[19]  D. Mannino,et al.  The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.