Optimization of pulse train presaturation for CEST imaging in clinical scanners

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging depends on the performance of radiofrequency saturation during the experiment. Scanner specifications, in particular limited pulse width and duty‐cycle, and specific absorption rate guidelines restrict the full exploitation of CEST effects in clinical MR systems. The purpose of this study was to optimize techniques for effective pulse train presaturation for CEST imaging in a whole‐body MR scanner. Theoretical analysis and simulations of the spectral properties of radiofrequency pulse trains demonstrated the significance of pulse width τP and interpulse delay τD for effective and selective labeling of a chemically exchanging proton pool. CEST experiments with model solutions, e.g., creatine dissolved in water, showed best performance of pulse trains with τP = τD = 100 msec, regarding minimum direct water saturation in z‐spectra and distinct magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry that can be determined quantitatively. Saturation efficiency of trains of Gaussian‐shaped radiofrequency pulses using this timing was evaluated in MR imagers with field strengths of 1.5, 3, and 7 T. The proposed saturation pulse train does not require hardware modifications, offers low specific absorption rate, and can be used in a standard clinical setup. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Thomas Benner,et al.  Investigation of optimizing and translating pH‐sensitive pulsed‐chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging to a 3T clinical scanner , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Fast 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging of the human brain , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Sharon Portnoy,et al.  Modeling pulsed magnetization transfer , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Water proton T1 measurements in brain tissue at 7, 3, and 1.5T using IR-EPI, IR-TSE, and MPRAGE: results and optimization , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[6]  G. Pike,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer in spoiled gradient echo MRI sequences. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[7]  Estimation of magnetization transfer rates from PACE experiments with pulsed RF saturation , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Optimized MRI contrast for on‐resonance proton exchange processes of PARACEST agents in biological systems , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Robert E Lenkinski,et al.  On-resonance low B1 pulses for imaging of the effects of PARACEST agents. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  G. Barker,et al.  Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  M. Bock,et al.  Intravascular contrast agent T1 shortening: fast T1 relaxometry in a carotid volunteer study , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[12]  Takashi Ogino,et al.  Characterization of macromolecule resonances in the 1H NMR spectrum of rat brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Parameterized evaluation of macromolecules and lipids in proton MR spectroscopy of brain diseases , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  A Dean Sherry,et al.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[15]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Optimization of the irradiation power in chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer experiments. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[16]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Understanding pulsed magnetization transfer , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Gil Navon,et al.  Assessment of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST) , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[19]  R S Balaban,et al.  A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[20]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging and spectroscopy , 2006 .

[21]  David C Alsop,et al.  A multislice gradient echo pulse sequence for CEST imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  D. Longmore The principles of magnetic resonance. , 1989, British medical bulletin.

[23]  R. Balaban,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Craig K. Jones,et al.  Four‐pool modeling of proton exchange processes in biological systems in the presence of MRI–paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) agents , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Matthew E Merritt,et al.  Numerical solution of the Bloch equations provides insights into the optimum design of PARACEST agents for MRI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  V. Govindaraju,et al.  Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites , 2000, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  Alain Pitiot,et al.  Magnetization transfer phenomenon in the human brain at 7 T , 2010, NeuroImage.