Substitution Frege and extended Frege proof systems in non-classical logics

Abstract We investigate the substitution Frege ( SF ) proof system and its relationship to extended Frege ( EF ) in the context of modal and superintuitionistic (si) propositional logics. We show that EF is p-equivalent to tree-like SF , and we develop a “normal form” for SF -proofs. We establish connections between SF for a logic L , and EF for certain bimodal expansions of L . We then turn attention to specific families of modal and si logics. We prove p-equivalence of EF and SF for all extensions of KB , all tabular logics, all logics of finite depth and width, and typical examples of logics of finite width and infinite depth. In most cases, we actually show an equivalence with the usual EF system for classical logic with respect to a naturally defined translation. On the other hand, we establish exponential speed-up of SF over EF for all modal and si logics of infinite branching, extending recent lower bounds by P. Hrubes. We develop a model-theoretical characterization of maximal logics of infinite branching to prove this result.

[1]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  On the complexity of the disjunction property in intuitionistic and modal logics , 2005, TOCL.

[2]  Pavel Pudlák,et al.  Monotone simulations of nonmonotone proofs , 2001, Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[3]  Michael Zakharyaschev,et al.  Modal Logic , 1997, Oxford logic guides.

[4]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Modal Logic , 2001, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science.

[5]  Emil Jerábek,et al.  Dual weak pigeonhole principle, Boolean complexity, and derandomization , 2004, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.

[6]  Arist Kojevnikov,et al.  Intuitionistic Frege systems are polynomially equivalent , 2006 .

[7]  Samuel R. Buss Polynomial Size Proofs of the Propositional Pigeonhole Principle , 1987, J. Symb. Log..

[8]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  On the computational content of intuitionistic propositional proofs , 2001, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[9]  Pavel Hrubes,et al.  Lower bounds for modal logics , 2007, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[10]  Noga Alon,et al.  The monotone circuit complexity of boolean functions , 1987, Comb..

[11]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  The Complexity of the Disjunction and Existential Properties in Intuitionistic Logic , 1999, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[12]  A. Chagrov,et al.  Modal Logic (Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 35) , 1997 .

[13]  Michael Zakharyaschev,et al.  Canonical formulas for K4. Part II: Cofinal subframe logics , 1996, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[14]  Krister Segerberg,et al.  An essay in classical modal logic , 1971 .

[15]  Pavel Hrubes,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[16]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof Systems , 1979, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[17]  Jan Krajícek,et al.  Bounded arithmetic, propositional logic, and complexity theory , 1995, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications.

[18]  Emil Jerábek,et al.  Frege systems for extensible modal logics , 2006, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[19]  Emil Jerábek,et al.  Admissible Rules of Modal Logics , 2005, J. Log. Comput..