Design Research Perspectives on Transitioning From Individual Microgenetic Interviews to a Whole-Class Teaching Experiment

This article describes an education design research program that began with individual microgenetic interviews with children in a laboratory setting and led to a developmental model of students’ understanding of quotients in mathematics and subsequently to the design and testing of an anchored instruction module for use in whole-class work. The authors discuss the design’s theoretical, methodological, and pragmatic aspects. They focus on the development of theory and the generation and refinement of artifacts as mutually constitutive in design research. Special attention is paid to making explicit the causal chain of arguments that link theory development, empirical tests of that theory, and product development. They make the case that effective interventions and rigorous theory can be codeveloped in the design paradigm.

[1]  H. McLellan Situated learning perspectives , 1996 .

[2]  James A. Middleton,et al.  The "compleat" design experiment: from soup to nuts , 2008 .

[3]  Martin A. Simon Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. , 1995 .

[4]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Conducting Teaching Experiments in Collaboration With Teachers , 2000 .

[5]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[6]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Ontological Innovation and the Role of Theory in Design Experiments , 2004 .

[7]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[8]  R. Lesh,et al.  Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. , 2000 .

[9]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development , 1997 .

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[11]  Brent Davis,et al.  Complexity and Education: Inquiries Into Learning, Teaching, and Research , 2006 .

[12]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements , 2000 .

[13]  Anthony E. Kelly,et al.  Theme Issue: The Role of Design in Educational Research , 2003 .

[14]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Evidence matters : randomized trials in education research , 2002 .

[15]  Finbarr C. Sloane,et al.  Exploring Modeling Aspects of Design Experiments , 2003 .

[16]  D. Berliner The Hardest Science of All by , 2002 .

[17]  James A. Middleton,et al.  The Emergence of Quotient Understandings in a Fifth-Grade Classroom: A Classroom Teaching Experiment. , 2001 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[19]  Gary E. Davis What Might a Fraction Mean to a Child and How Would a Teacher Know , 1993 .

[20]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2002 .

[21]  David Kirshner,et al.  Situated cognition : social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives , 2009 .

[22]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[23]  M. Megel,et al.  Research Design , 2019, Beiträge zur Landschafts- und Umweltplanung I Contributions to Landscape and Environmental Planning.

[24]  L. Quéré Cognition in Practice , 1996 .

[25]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[26]  Thomas A. Romberg,et al.  Rational numbers : an integration of research , 1993 .

[27]  R. Sawyer The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[28]  Daiyo Sawada,et al.  PARTITIONING: THE EMERGENCE OF RATIONAL NUMBER IDEAS IN YOUNG CHILDREN , 1983 .

[29]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[30]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Rational number, ratio and proportion , 1992 .

[31]  Leen Streefland,et al.  Fractions in Realistic Mathematics Education , 1991 .

[32]  D. Berliner Comment: Educational Research:The Hardest Science of All , 2002 .

[33]  P. Cobb,et al.  Mathematizing and Symbolizing: The Emergence of Chains of Signification in One First-Grade Classroom , 2021, Situated Cognition.

[34]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[35]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[36]  Paul Cobb,et al.  An Analysis of Development of Sociomathematical Norms in One First-Grade Classroom , 2001 .

[37]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[38]  THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN ’ S UNDERSTANDING OF THE QUOTIENT : A TEACHING EXPERIMENT , 2004 .

[39]  Leen Streefland,et al.  Fractions in Realistic Mathematics Education: A Paradigm of Developmental Research , 1991 .

[40]  A. Kelly Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? , 2004 .

[41]  D. C. Phillips,et al.  On the Science of Education Design Studies , 2003 .

[42]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[43]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Understanding and explicating the design experiment methodology , 2002 .

[44]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice , 1998 .

[45]  Thomas E. Kieren,et al.  Rational and fractional numbers: From quotient fields to recursive understanding , 1993 .