Perspectives of staff nurses of the reasons for and the nature of patient-initiated call lights: an exploratory survey study in four USA hospitals

BackgroundLittle research has been done on patient call light use and staff response time, which were found to be associated with inpatient falls and satisfaction. Nurses' perspectives may moderate or mediate the aforementioned relationships. This exploratory study intended to understand staff's perspectives about call lights, staff responsiveness, and the reasons for and the nature of call light use. It also explored differences among hospitals and identified significant predictors of the nature of call light use.MethodsThis cross-sectional, multihospital survey study was conducted from September 2008 to January 2009 in four hospitals located in the Midwestern region of the United States. A brief survey was used. All 2309 licensed and unlicensed nursing staff members who provide direct patient care in 27 adult care units were invited to participate. A total of 808 completed surveys were retrieved for an overall response rate of 35%. The SPSS 16.0 Window version was used. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted.ResultsThe primary reasons for patient-initiated calls were for toileting assistance, pain medication, and intravenous problems. Toileting assistance was the leading reason. Each staff responded to 6 to 7 calls per hour and a call was answered within 4 minutes (estimated). 49% of staff perceived that patient-initiated calls mattered to patient safety. 77% agreed that that these calls were meaningful. 52% thought that these calls required the attention of nursing staff. 53% thought that answering calls prevented them from doing the critical aspects of their role. Staff's perceptions about the nature of calls varied across hospitals. Junior staff tended to overlook the importance of answering calls. A nurse participant tended to perceive calls as more likely requiring nursing staff's attention than a nurse aide participant.ConclusionsIf answering calls was a high priority among nursing tasks, staff would perceive calls as being important, requiring nursing staff's attention, and being meaningful. Therefore, answering calls should not be perceived as preventing staff from doing the critical aspects of their role. Additional efforts are necessary to reach the ideal or even a reasonable level of patient safety-first practice in current hospital environments.

[1]  C. Meade,et al.  Effects of Nursing Rounds: on Patients' Call Light Use, Satisfaction, and Safety , 2006, The American journal of nursing.

[2]  Jason Kuruzovich,et al.  Wireless Communication Role in Patient Response Time: A Study of Vocera Integration With a Nurse Call System , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[3]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  An Analysis of Inpatient Nursing Communications Needs , 2004, MedInfo.

[4]  K. Hăndel,et al.  Prevalence and Nature of Call Light Requests on an Orthopaedic Unit , 1994, Orthopedic nursing.

[5]  Huey-Ming Tzeng,et al.  Relationship between call light use and response time and inpatient falls in acute care settings. , 2009, Journal of clinical nursing.

[6]  Laurie Mallery,et al.  Ability of hospitalized older adults to use their call bell: a pilot study in a tertiary care teaching hospital , 2005, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[7]  Huey-Ming Tzeng,et al.  The Extrinsic Risk Factors for Inpatient Falls in Hospital Patient Rooms , 2008, Journal of nursing care quality.

[8]  Joanna Bokovoy,et al.  Dance of the Call Bells: Using Ethnography to Evaluate Patient Satisfaction With Quality of Care , 2006, Journal of nursing care quality.

[9]  Huey-Ming Tzeng,et al.  Perspectives of Recently Discharged Patients on Hospital Fall‐Prevention Programs , 2009, Journal of nursing care quality.

[10]  Gail Powell-Cope,et al.  Reducing Serious Injury From Falls in Two Veterans' Hospital Medical‐Surgical Units , 2009, Journal of nursing care quality.

[11]  Nurse call systems: impact on nursing performance. , 1997, Journal of nursing care quality.

[12]  Cheryl B. Jones,et al.  Call Bell Requests, Call Bell Response Time, and Patient Satisfaction , 2009, Journal of nursing care quality.

[13]  Susan M Torres,et al.  Rapid-Cycle Process Reduces Patient Call Bell Use, Improves Patient Satisfaction, and Anticipates Patient's Needs , 2007, The Journal of nursing administration.

[14]  Leanne M Currie,et al.  Fall and Injury Prevention , 2006, Annual Review of Nursing Research.

[15]  Huey-Ming Tzeng,et al.  Perspectives of staff nurses toward patient- and family-initiated call light usage and response time to call lights. , 2011, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[16]  H. Tzeng,et al.  Are Call Light Use and Response Time Correlated With Inpatient Falls and Inpatient Dissatisfaction? , 2009, Journal of nursing care quality.