How a co-actor’s task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study

Efficient flexible behavior requires continuous monitoring of performance for possible deviations from the intended goal of an action. This also holds for joint action. When jointly performing a task, one needs to not only know the other’s goals and intentions but also generate behavioral adjustments that are dependent on the other person’s task. Previous studies have shown that in joint action people not only represent their own task but also the task of their co-actor. The current study investigated whether these so-called shared representations affect error monitoring as reflected in the response-locked error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) following own errors. Sixteen pairs of participants performed a social go/no-go task, while EEG and behavioral data were obtained. Responses were compatible or incompatible relative to the go/no-go action of the co-actor. Erroneous responses on no-go stimuli were examined. The results demonstrated increased Ne/ERN amplitudes and longer reaction times following errors on compatible compared to incompatible no-go stimuli. Thus, Ne/ERNs were larger after errors on trials that did not require a response from the co-actor either compared to errors on trials that did require a response from the co-actor. As the task of the other person is the only difference between these two types of errors, these findings show that people also represent their co-actor’s task during error monitoring in joint action. An extension of existing models on performance monitoring in individual action is put forward to explain the current findings in joint action. Importantly, we propose that inclusion of a co-actor’s task in performance monitoring may facilitate adaptive behavior in social interactions enabling fast anticipatory and corrective actions.

[1]  P. Rabbitt Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[7]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[9]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[10]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[11]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[12]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Twin Peaks: An ERP Study of Action Planning and Control in Coacting Individuals , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Wen-Jui Kuo,et al.  A common coding framework in self–other interaction: evidence from joint action task , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Ricarda I. Schubotz,et al.  An event-related potential study on the observation of erroneous everyday actions , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition , 2008, Cortex.

[19]  Wen-Jui Kuo,et al.  Action Co-representation is Tuned to Other Humans , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Ullsperger,et al.  Pathological Changes in Performance Monitoring , 2011 .

[21]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Your Mistake Is My Mistake . . . or Is It? Behavioural Adjustments following Own and Observed Actions in Cooperative and Competitive Contexts , 2022 .