THE EFFECTS OF CHANGING PATTERNS OF EMPLOYMENT ON REPORTING OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND MAKING WORKER' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

In the past 20 years there has been a significant growth in those working in self-employme nt, in micro small businesses, or under casual, part-time, subcontract, franchised, telework or homeworking arrangements in Australia. These employment status groups are now commonly known as precarious workers; principally because their continued employment and income is uncertain. The available research indicates that the probability of a work-related injury is greater for precarious workers. This paper focuses on the extent to which precariously employed Australian workers formally report their work-related injuries and illnesses and claim workers' compensation. While Australia has comprehensive - although fragmented - workers' compensation insurance systems, this formal coverage does not correlate with the propensity to make workers' compensation claims. Findings from a series of Australian precarious worker studies are summarised in this paper and a detailed analysis of workers' compensation claims experiences from our latest research project on long distance truck drivers is presented. We argue that even those precarious workers covered by workers' compensation insurance are less likely to claim than other workers for two key reasons: uncertainty of coverage and fear of consequences if a claim is made. Thus injured precarious workers are more reliant on their own resources after injury, to externalise injury treatment costs onto taxpayer funded resources, or to leave injuries and illness untreated with a potential to develop into chronic conditions.

[1]  H Bielenski New patterns of employment in Europe. , 1999, WHO regional publications. European series.

[2]  Michael Quinlan,et al.  Labour Market Restructuring in Industrialised Societies: An Overview , 1998 .

[3]  John Burgess,et al.  The Nature and Dimensions of Precarious Employment in Australia , 1998 .

[4]  Michael Quinlan,et al.  The Implications of Labour Market Restructuring in Industrialized Societies for Occupational Health and Safety , 1999 .

[5]  Michael Quinlan,et al.  The Relationship between Precarious Employment and Patterns of Occupational Violence , 2000 .

[6]  R. Hall,et al.  Contingent Work and Gender in Australia: Evidence from the 1995 Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey , 1998 .

[7]  M. Quinlan,et al.  Precarious employment and workers' compensation. , 1999, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[8]  J. Burgess,et al.  Casual Employment in Australia: Growth, Characteristics, a Bridge or a Trap? , 1998 .

[9]  J. A. Morris,et al.  Injury Experience of Temporary Workers in a Manufacturing Setting: Factors that Increase Vulnerability , 1999, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[10]  James B. Rebitzer,et al.  Human resource strategies and contingent workers: The case of safety and health in the petrochemical industry , 1994 .

[11]  Michael Quinlan,et al.  Subcontracting and occupational health and safety in the residential building industry , 1997 .

[12]  M. Alaluf,et al.  New forms of work and activity : survey of experience at establishment level in eight European countries , 1994 .

[13]  Gunnar Aronsson,et al.  Contingent Workers and Health and Safety , 1999 .