A photo-modulatable material for probing cellular responses to substrate rigidity.

Recent studies indicate that extracellular mechanical properties, including rigidity, profoundly affect cellular morphology, growth, migration, and differentiation [R. J. Pelham, Jr. and Y. Wang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1997, 94(25), 13661-13665; H. B. Wang, M. Dembo and Y. L. Wang, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 2000, 279(5), C1345-C1350; P. C. Georges, and P. A. Janmey, J. Appl. Physiol., 2005, 98(4), 1547-1553; C. M. Lo, H. B. Wang, M. Dembo and Y. L. Wang, Biophys. J., 2000. 79(1), 144-152; D. E. Discher, P. Janmey and Y. L. Wang, Science, 2005, 310(5751), 1139-1143; A. J. Engler, M. A. Griffin, S. Sen, C. G. Bonnemann, H. L. Sweeney and D. E. Discher, J. Cell Biol., 2004, 166(6), 877-887]. However, most studies involving rigidity sensing have been performed by comparing cells on separate substrata of fixed stiffness. To allow spatial and/or temporal manipulation of mechanical properties, we have developed a modulatable hydrogel by reacting linear polyacrylamide (PA) with a photosensitive crosslinker. This material allows UV-mediated control of rigidity, softening by 20-30% upon irradiation at a dose tolerated by live cells. Global UV irradiation induces an immediate recoiling of 3T3 fibroblasts and a reduced spread area at steady state. Furthermore, localized softening of the posterior substratum of polarized cells causes no apparent effect, while softening of the anterior substratum elicits pronounced retraction, indicating that rigidity sensing is localized to the frontal region. This type of material allows precise spatial and temporal control of mechanical signals for both basic research and regenerative medicine.

[1]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  A simple microindentation technique for mapping the microscale compliance of soft hydrated materials and tissues. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[2]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Cell tension, matrix mechanics, and cancer development. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[3]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[4]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[7]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Can cancer be reversed by engineering the tumor microenvironment? , 2008, Seminars in cancer biology.

[8]  A. Chadli.  THE CANCER CELL , 1924, La Presse medicale.

[9]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  S. Hanks,et al.  Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[12]  W. T. Chen.  Induction of spreading during fibroblast movement , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  Radhika Desai,et al.  ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  Laura A. Poole-Warren,et al.  A photo-crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel growth factor release vehicle for wound healing applications , 2003, AAPS PharmSci.

[16]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  Riboflavin activated by ultraviolet A1 irradiation induces oxidative DNA damage-mediated mutations inhibited by vitamin C , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[18]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[19]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[21]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[22]  J. Aplin,et al.  Protein-derivatised glass coverslips for the study of cell-to substratum adhesion. , 1981, Analytical biochemistry.

[23]  D. Discher,et al.  Extracellular matrix elasticity directs stem cell differentiation. , 2007, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[24]  T. Creighton.  Methods in Enzymology , 1968, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[25]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Mammary epithelial cell: influence of extracellular matrix composition and organization during development and tumorigenesis. , 2007, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[26]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[28]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[29]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  Direct comparison of the spread area, contractility, and migration of balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- and RGD-modified substrata. , 2004, Biophysical journal.