Comparison of methods used in European National Forest Inventories for the estimation of volume increment: towards harmonisation

Key messageThe increment estimation methods of European NFIs were explored by means of 12 essential NFI features. The results indicate various differences among NFIs within the commonly acknowledged methodological frame. The perspectives for harmonisation at the European level are promising.ContextThe estimation of increment is implemented differently in European National Forest Inventories (NFIs) due to different historical origins of NFIs and sampling designs and field assessments accommodated to country-specific conditions. The aspired harmonisation of increment estimation requires a comparison and an analysis of NFI methods.AimsThe objective was to investigate the differences in volume increment estimation methods used in European NFIs. The conducted work shall set a basis for harmonisation at the European level which is needed to improve information on forest resources for various strategic processes.MethodsA comprehensive enquiry was conducted during Cost Action FP1001 to explore the methods of increment estimation of 29 European NFIs. The enquiry built upon the preceding Cost Action E43 and was complemented by an analysis of literature to demonstrate the methodological backgrounds.ResultsThe comparison of methods revealed differences concerning the NFI features such as sampling grids, periodicity of assessments, permanent and temporary plots, use of remote sensing, sample tree selection, components of forest growth, forest area changes, sampling thresholds, field measurements, drain assessment, involved models and tree parts included in estimates.ConclusionIncrement estimation methods differ considerably among European NFIs. Their harmonisation introduces new issues into the harmonisation process. Recent accomplishments and the increased use of sample-based inventories in Europe make perspectives for harmonised reporting of increment estimation promising.

[1]  Q. V. Cao.  Prediction of annual diameter growth and survival for individual trees from periodic measurements , 2000 .

[2]  Heinrich Spiecker,et al.  Growth trends in European forests : studies from 12 countries , 1996 .

[3]  L. Greene.  EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[4]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Modeling climate change effects on the potential production of French plains forests at the sub-regional level. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[5]  R. Monserud,et al.  Annualized diameter and height growth equations for Pacific Northwest plantation-grown Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and red alder. , 2007 .

[6]  PackalénPetteri,et al.  Predicting forest growth based on airborne light detection and ranging data, climate data, and a simplified process-based model , 2013 .

[7]  E. Tomppo.  National Forest Inventories : pathways for common reporting , 2010 .

[8]  W. Weibull.  A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[9]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimating forest growth using canopy metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2005 .

[10]  H. Biolley.  L'aménagement des forêts par la méthode expérimentale et spécialement la méthode du controle , 1920 .

[11]  Francis A. Roesch,et al.  New Compatible Estimators for Survivor Growth and Ingrowth from Remeasured Horizontal Point Samples , 1989 .

[12]  E. Tomppo,et al.  Harmonization of National Forest Inventories in Europe: Advances under COST Action E43 , 2012 .

[13]  María Vanessa Lencinas,et al.  Equations of bark thickness and volume profiles at different heights with easy-measurement variables , 2012 .

[14]  T. R. Dell,et al.  Volume growth estimation from permanent horizontal points , 1986 .

[15]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Comparisons of National Forest Inventories , 2010 .

[16]  Per Gundersen,et al.  The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by European forests , 2009 .

[17]  E. Tomppo,et al.  Establishing Bridging Functions for Harmonizing Growing Stock Estimates: Examples from European National Forest Inventories , 2012 .

[18]  Mathieu Jonard,et al.  The Conditions of Forests in Europe : 2013 Executive Report. , 2014 .

[19]  P. Deusen.  Comparison of some annual forest inventory estimators , 2002 .

[20]  Daniel de Graaf,et al.  Country report for Germany , 2010 .

[21]  Bertram Husch,et al.  Forest mensuration and statistics. , 1963 .

[22]  Raisa Mäkipää,et al.  Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe , 2005, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[23]  Fritz Zöhrer.  Forstinventur : ein Leitfaden für Studium und Praxis , 1980 .

[24]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[25]  Timo Melkas,et al.  Modelling bark thickness of Picea abies with taper curves , 2005 .

[26]  G. Ståhl,et al.  National Forest Inventories: Prospects for Harmonised International Reporting , 2010 .

[27]  Ingrid Seynave,et al.  Recent changes in forest productivity: An analysis of national forest inventory data for common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in north-eastern France , 2010 .

[28]  T. W. Beers.  Components of forest growth. , 1960 .

[29]  W. Zech,et al.  Growth variations of Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different climatic and environmental conditions in Europe—a dendroecological study , 2003 .

[30]  E. Pott.  Country report. Germany. , 1995, Promotion & education.

[31]  J. Gove,et al.  Forest inventory , 2001 .

[32]  Timothy G. Gregoire,et al.  Estimation of forest growth from successive surveys , 1993 .

[33]  Markus Lier,et al.  State of Europe\'s forests, 2011: status & trends in sustainable forest management in Europe , 2011 .

[34]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Bridging national and reference definitions for harmonizing forest statistics , 2012 .

[35]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  Establishing Forest Inventory Reference Definitions for Forest and Growing Stock: a Study towards Common Reporting , 2008 .

[36]  A. Lanz,et al.  Common tree definitions for National Forest Inventories in Europe. , 2009 .

[37]  J. Heikkinen,et al.  Interpolating and Extrapolating Information from Periodic Forest Surveys for Annual Greenhouse Gas Reporting , 2012 .

[38]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Sampling Methods, Remote Sensing and GIS Multiresource Forest Inventory , 2006 .

[39]  Jacques Rondeux,et al.  Estimation de l’accroissement et de la production forestière à l’aide de placettes permanentes concentriques , 2005 .

[40]  J. Flewelling,et al.  An improved estimator for merchantable basal area growth based on point samples , 1984 .

[41]  Antje Sommer,et al.  Sampling Techniques For Forest Resource Inventory , 2016 .

[42]  G. Reinds,et al.  Modelling impacts of changes in carbon dioxide concentration, climate and nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by European forests and forest soils , 2009 .

[43]  G. Matteucci,et al.  On the tracks of Nitrogen deposition effects on temperate forests at their southern European range – an observational study from Italy , 2014, Global change biology.

[44]  R. McRoberts,et al.  An enquiry on forest areas reported to the global forest resources assessment—is harmonization needed? , 2012 .

[45]  Walter Bitterlich,et al.  The relascope idea. Relative measurements in forestry. , 1984 .

[46]  W. Bitterlich,et al.  Die Winkelzählprobe , 1952, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt.

[47]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Adapting National Forest Inventories to changing requirements - the case of the Swedish National Forest Inventory at the turn of the 20th century , 2014 .