Natural history of adult spinal deformity: how do patients with suboptimal surgical outcomes fare relative to nonoperative counterparts?

OBJECTIVE Management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increasingly favored operative intervention; however, the incidence of complications and reoperations is high, and patients may fail to achieve idealized postsurgical results. This study compared health-related quality of life (HRQOL) metrics between patients with suboptimal surgical outcomes and those who underwent nonoperative management as a proxy for the natural history (NH) of ASD. METHODS ASD patients with 2-year data were included. Patients who were offered surgery but declined were considered nonoperative (i.e., NH) patients. Operative patients with suboptimal outcome (SOp)-defined as any reoperation, major complication, or ≥ 2 severe Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab modifiers at follow-up-were selected for comparison. Propensity score matching (PSM) on the basis of baseline age, deformity, SRS-22 Total, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was used to match the groups. ANCOVA and stepwise logistic regression analysis were used to assess outcomes between groups at 2 years. RESULTS In total, 441 patients were included (267 SOp and 174 NH patients). After PSM, 142 patients remained (71 SOp 71 and 71 NH patients). At baseline, the SOp and NH groups had similar demographic characteristics, HRQOL, and deformity (all p > 0.05). At 2 years, ANCOVA determined that NH patients had worse deformity as measured with sagittal vertical axis (36.7 mm vs 21.3 mm, p = 0.025), mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (11.9° vs 2.9°, p < 0.001), and pelvic tilt (PT) (23.1° vs 20.7°, p = 0.019). The adjusted regression analysis found that SOp patients had higher odds of reaching the minimal clinically important differences in Oswestry Disability Index score (OR [95% CI] 4.5 [1.7-11.5], p = 0.002), SRS-22 Activity (OR [95% CI] 3.2 [1.5-6.8], p = 0.002), SRS-22 Pain (OR [95% CI] 2.8 [1.4-5.9], p = 0.005), and SRS-22 Total (OR [95% CI] 11.0 [3.5-34.4], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Operative patients with SOp still experience greater improvements in deformity and HRQOL relative to the progressive radiographic and functional deterioration associated with the NH of ASD. The NH of nonoperative management should be accounted for when weighing the risks and benefits of operative intervention for ASD.

[1]  R. Lafage,et al.  Performance of the Modified Adult Spinal Deformity Frailty Index in Preoperative Risk Assessment , 2022, Spine.

[2]  F. Schwab,et al.  Not Frail and Elderly: How Invasive Can We Go in This Different Type of Adult Spinal Deformity Patient? , 2021, Spine.

[3]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Invasiveness and Morbidity of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery to Other Major Operations. , 2021, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  M. Kelly,et al.  Does Patient Frailty Status Influence Recovery Following Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?: An Analysis of Patients With 3-Year Follow-up. , 2020, Spine.

[5]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Recovery kinetics following spinal deformity correction: a comparison of isolated cervical, thoracolumbar, and combined deformity morphometries. , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  M. V. van Hooff,et al.  The Natural History of Progression in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis , 2019, Global spine journal.

[7]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis , 2019, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Development of a Preoperative Predictive Model for Reaching the Oswestry Disability Index Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Adult Spinal Deformity Patients , 2018, Spine deformity.

[9]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Operative Management of Adult Spinal Deformity Results in Significant Increases in QALYs Gained Compared to Nonoperative Management: Analysis of 479 Patients With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up , 2018, Spine.

[10]  K. Bridwell,et al.  SRS-22R Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Adult Lumbar Scoliosis Surgery , 2018, Spine deformity.

[11]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  An assessment of frailty as a tool for risk stratification in adult spinal deformity surgery. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[12]  T. Mattei,et al.  Effectiveness of Operative and Nonoperative Care for Adult Spinal Deformity: Systematic Review of the Literature , 2017, Global spine journal.

[13]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Medical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact , 2016, Spine.

[14]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[15]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Prospective multicenter assessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postoperative complication rates associated with adult spinal deformity surgery. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  The Health Impact of Symptomatic Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Deformity Types to United States Population Norms and Chronic Diseases , 2016, Spine.

[17]  Juan S. Uribe,et al.  Current Status of Adult Spinal Deformity , 2012, Global Spine Journal.

[18]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[19]  L. Lenke,et al.  Changes in Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes With Primary Treatment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeries From Two Years to Three- to Five-Years Follow-up , 2010, Spine.

[20]  W. Skalli,et al.  Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[21]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: Prevalence, SF-36, and Nutritional Parameters in an Elderly Volunteer Population , 2005, Spine.

[22]  W. Skalli,et al.  [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance]. , 2003, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.