论文信息 - Reaction –– Themis and Dike in the International Arena: Comments on von Bogdandy's and Venzke's “Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking”

Reaction –– Themis and Dike in the International Arena: Comments on von Bogdandy's and Venzke's “Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking”

The Max Planck Institute's research on international judicial institutions as lawmakers, which was published in May as a special issue of the German Law Journal, is an important contribution to the analysis of one of the most complex and controversial legal issues in our epoch. In the last two decades, international adjudication has become a recurrent source of legal concern, and sometimes even a source of public concern.

G. D. Cananea

[1] I. Venzke. Making General Exceptions: The Spell of Precedents in Developing Article XX GATT into Standards for Domestic Regulatory Policy , 2011, German Law Journal.

[2] A. Moravcsik,et al. Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism , 2009, International Organization.

[3] R. Stewart,et al. The Emergence of Global Administrative Law , 2005 .

[4] Anne-Marie Slaughter,et al. Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational , 2000, International Organization.

[5] J. Ely,et al. Constitutional Interpretation: Text, Values, and Processes@@@Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. , 1981 .

[6] G. D. Cananea. Themis and Dike in the International Arena - Comments on Armin Von Bogdandy and Ingo Vetzke's 'Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking' , 2011 .

[7] R. Howse. The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate , 2002 .