Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework

[1]  K. Lewin,et al.  The Action Research Planner , 2003 .

[2]  V. Akila,et al.  Information , 2001, The Lancet.

[3]  Graeme Simsion,et al.  Data Modeling Essentials 2nd Edition: A Comprehensive Guide to Data Analysis, Design, and Innovation , 2000 .

[4]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2000 .

[5]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Building links between IS research and professional practice: improving the relevance and impact of IS research , 2000, ICIS.

[6]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Strategies for improving the quality of entity relationship models: a toolkit for practitioners , 2000, IRMA Conference.

[7]  Kirsty Williamson,et al.  Research methods for students and professionals: information management and systems , 2000 .

[8]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[9]  W. Godwin.  Article in Press , 2000 .

[10]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The systems development or engineering approach to research in information systems: an action research perspective , 1999 .

[13]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1998, ER.

[14]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Improving the Quality of Entity Relationship Models: An Action Research Programme , 1998, Aust. Comput. J..

[15]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  What Makes a Good Data Model? A Framework for Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1998, Aust. Comput. J..

[16]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  A Comparative Study of Conceptual Data Modeling Techniques , 1998, J. Database Manag..

[17]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[18]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[19]  A. Dillon.  Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use , 1997 .

[20]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Entity-Relationship and Object-Oriented Data Modeling-an Experimental Comparison of Design Quality , 1997, Data Knowl. Eng..

[21]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological foundations of information systems , 1997 .

[23]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[24]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Conceptual Data Modelling: an empirical study of expert and novice data modellers , 1997, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Quality in Conceptual Modelling: Linking Theory and Practice , 1997, PACIS.

[26]  R. Baskerville,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Ernest T. Stringer.  Action research : a handbook for practitioners , 1996 .

[28]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Comparing Object-Oriented and Extended-Entity-Relationship Data Models , 1995 .

[29]  John Krogstie,et al.  Towards a Deeper Understanding of Quality in Requirements Engineering , 1995, CAiSE.

[30]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Comparing data modeling formalisms , 1995, CACM.

[31]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[32]  Anany Levitin,et al.  Quality Dimensions of a Conceptual View , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[33]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective systems design and requirements analysis : the ETHICS approach , 1995 .

[34]  Someswar Kesh,et al.  Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models , 1995, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[35]  Graeme Simsion,et al.  Justifying Investment in Information Resource Management , 1995, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  What Makes a Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1994, ER.

[37]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[38]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Relevance and rigour in Information Systems Research: some personal reflections on issues facing the Information Systems research community , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[39]  A. Baddeley.  The magical number seven: still magic after all these years? , 1994, Psychological review.

[40]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[41]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Building an IS architecture: Collective wisdom from the field , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Graeme C. Simsion.  Data modeling essentials - analysis, design, and innovation , 1993, VNR computer library.

[43]  T. Davenport.  Saving IT's Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. , 1994 .

[44]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Conceptual Data Modeling Process: A Study of Novice and Expert Data Modellers , 1994, ORM.

[45]  Christopher Westrup,et al.  Information systems methodologies in use , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[46]  Douglas B. Bock,et al.  Accuracy in Modeling with Extended Entity Relationship and Object Oriented Data Models , 1993 .

[47]  Charlene Walrad,et al.  Measurement: The Key to Application Development Quality , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[48]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Software engineering - principles and practice , 1993 .

[49]  I. Holter,et al.  Action research: what is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[50]  Dinesh Batra,et al.  Conceptual Data Modelling in Database Design: Similarities and Differences between Expert and Novice Designers , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[51]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Analysing the Novice Analyst: Cognitive Models in Software Engineering , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[52]  Allen S. Lee.  Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[53]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Reuse and Productivity in Integrated Computer-Aided Software Engineering: An Empirical Study , 1991, MIS Q..

[54]  J. McKernan.  Curriculum Action Research: A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner , 1991 .

[55]  Shamkant B. Navathe,et al.  Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship Approach , 1991 .

[56]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[57]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[58]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems development in information systems research , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[59]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Comparing representations with relational and EER models , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[60]  James R. Evans,et al.  The management and control of quality , 1989 .

[61]  KaplanBonnie,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research , 1988 .

[62]  Henry Holloway.  Desk Top Publishing Meeting , 1988, J. Inf. Technol..

[63]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[64]  Therese L. Baker,et al.  Doing Social Research , 1987 .

[65]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Database schema design: an experimental comparison between normalization and information analysis , 1987, DATB.

[66]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proc. of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on Information systems design methodologies: improving the practice , 1986 .

[67]  Bill Curtis,et al.  By the way, did anyone study any real programmers? , 1986 .

[68]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Dimensions of information systems design: A framework for a long-range research program , 1986, Inf. Syst..

[69]  T. W. Olle.  IFIP comparative review of information systems design methodologies: problem definition , 1986 .

[70]  Ian G. MacDonald,et al.  Information Engineering , 2019, Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice.

[71]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[72]  R. Caplan,et al.  Coping and defense: constellations vs. components. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[73]  D. A Jardine,et al.  Concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base , 1984 .

[74]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review , 1983 .

[75]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis , 1983 .

[76]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[77]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[78]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[79]  William Kent,et al.  Data and Reality: Basic Assumptions in Data Processing Reconsidered , 1978 .

[80]  N. Rescher.  Methodological Pragmatism: A Systems-Theoretic Approach to the Theory of Knowledge , 1977 .

[81]  N. Rescher,et al.  The Primacy of Practice. , 1975 .

[82]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Information Systems , 1973, GI Jahrestagung.

[83]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[84]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[85]  R. G. Studer,et al.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1965 .

[86]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[87]  K. Lewin.  Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[88]  S. Chow.  Significance Test or Effect Size ? , 2022 .

[89]  S. Lauesen,et al.  Preventing Requirement Defects: An Experiment in Process Improvement , 2001, Requirements Engineering.