Exploratory and Exploitative Adaptation in Turbulent and Complex Landscapes

Using a simulation of organizational adaptation in turbulent and complex landscapes, I examine how the optimal balance between exploration and exploitation is influenced by the organization’s task environment. I find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, increasing exploration relative to exploitation is not always the optimal response to increased environmental turbulence or complexity. Turbulence is found to have a curvilinear effect on the optimal share of exploratory versus exploitative adaptation, with the relative importance of exploitation greatest at moderate degrees of turbulence. While environmental complexity is found to have a generally positive effect on the optimal share of exploration, the effects of complexity and turbulence are found to interact and, jointly, to increase the relative importance of exploitative adaptation over exploratory adaptation. These findings suggest that the proper exploration–exploitation balance depends, in complex ways, on the pressures for global versus local adaptability posed by the interaction of turbulence and complexity.

[1]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling of Ambidextrous Organizations: Virtualizing Competitive Strategy , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Myopia of Selection: Does Organizational Adaptation Limit the Efficacy of Population Selection? , 2007 .

[3]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[4]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[6]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[7]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations , 2009 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[9]  R. Duncan Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[10]  Mary M. Crossan,et al.  Strategic Renewal as Improvisation: Reconciling the Tension Between Exploration and Exploitation , 2006 .

[11]  Bob Walrave,et al.  Getting Trapped in the Suppression of Exploration: A Simulation Model , 2011 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[13]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[14]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[15]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[18]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[19]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions , 2000 .

[21]  H. Volberda,et al.  Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[22]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[23]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[24]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[25]  David S. Walker,et al.  Self‐organization, evolutionary and revolutionary change in organizations , 2005 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[28]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[30]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Complex Business Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneously , 2010 .

[31]  Christina Fang,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organization Learning , 2008 .

[32]  J. Ricart,et al.  Corporate Strategy: An Agent‐Based Approach , 2007 .

[33]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[34]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[36]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[37]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  WHEN EXPLORATION BACKFIRES: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MULTILEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL SEARCH , 2006 .

[40]  F. Damanpour Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[41]  Jan W. Rivkin Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity , 2001 .

[42]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[43]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[44]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[45]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[46]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[47]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance , 2012 .

[48]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies , 2010 .

[49]  Joan E. Ricart,et al.  Corporate strategy revisited: a view from complexity theory , 2003 .

[50]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Two Faces of Search: Alternative Generation and Alternative Evaluation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Organizing to Strategize in the Face of Interactions: Preventing Premature Lock-in , 2006 .

[52]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .

[53]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[54]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[55]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Chasing a Moving Target: Exploitation and Exploration in Dynamic Environments , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[56]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity , 2001 .

[57]  F. Bosch,et al.  Following the Herd or Not?: Patterns of Renewal in the Netherlands and the UK , 2001 .

[58]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[59]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[60]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[61]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[62]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .