I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli

Drawing on decades of research suggesting an attentional advantage for self-related information, researchers generally assume that self-related stimuli automatically capture attention. However, a literature review reveals that this claim has not been systematically examined. We aimed to fill in this dearth of evidence. Following a feature-based account of automaticity, we set up four experiments in which participants were asked to respond to a target preceded by a cue, which was self-related or not. In Experiment 1, larger cuing effects (faster reaction times to valid versus invalid trials) were found with a participant’s own name compared with someone else’s name. In Experiment 2, we replicated these results with unconscious cues. Experiment 3 suggested that these effects are not likely driven by familiarity. In Experiment 4, participants experienced greater difficulties from having their attention being captured by their own compared with someone else’s name. We conclude that attentional capture by self-related stimuli is automatic in the sense that it is unintentional, unconscious, and uncontrolled. Implications for self-regulation and intergroup relations are discussed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[2]  A. Greenwald The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[3]  J. M. Nuttin Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect , 1985 .

[4]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. Bargh Attention and Automaticity in the Processing of Self-Relevant Information , 1982 .

[6]  François Ric,et al.  Unconscious addition: when we unconsciously initiate and follow arithmetic rules. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002 .

[8]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[9]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[10]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[12]  K. Forster,et al.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. , 2004, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[14]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  The focusing effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Abrupt onsets and gaze direction cues trigger independent reflexive attentional effects , 2003, Cognition.

[18]  L. Optican,et al.  Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[20]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[21]  M. Strube,et al.  Self-Evaluation: To Thine Own Self Be Good, To Thine Own Self Be Sure, To Thine Own Self Be True, an , 1997 .

[22]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[23]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Attention and the Processing of Emotional Words and Names , 2004, Psychological science.

[24]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[26]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation q , 2008 .

[27]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Reduced Repetition Blindness for One's Own Name , 1999 .

[28]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[29]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[30]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence , 1996 .

[31]  Correcting for measurement error in detecting unconscious cognition: comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998) , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  R. M. Jensen,et al.  Is visual attention automatically attracted by one’s own name? , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  B. Pelham,et al.  Implicit Egotism , 2005, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[34]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  What's in a name: implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[36]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[37]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer , 2009, Cognition.

[38]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[39]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  J. Bargh Automaticity in social psychology. , 1996 .

[41]  N. Cowan,et al.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  H. Gray,et al.  P 300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli q , 2004 .

[43]  S. Harkins,et al.  Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  S. Kitayama Remembrance of Emotional Speech: Improvement and Impairment of Incidental Verbal Memory by Emotional Voice , 1996 .

[45]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Encoding of Personal Information: Self-Other Differences. , 1979 .

[46]  J. Polich Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[47]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  E. Koster,et al.  What's in a name? Attachment-related attentional bias. , 2007, Emotion.

[50]  R. Shprintzen,et al.  What's in a name? , 1990, The Cleft palate journal.

[51]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Automatic self-regulation. , 2004 .

[52]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Reflexive Joint Attention Depends on Lateralized Cortical Connections , 2000, Psychological science.

[53]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[54]  K. Briand,et al.  Feature integration and spatial attention : More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting , 1998 .

[55]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[56]  D. Wentura,et al.  About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks , 1999 .

[57]  K. Forster,et al.  Forty-five Years After Broadbent : Still No Identification Without Attention , 1988 .

[58]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Portraits of the self , 2003 .

[60]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection , 1986 .

[61]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions , 1978, Vision Research.

[62]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  G Wolford,et al.  Processing of unattended visual information , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[64]  H. Pashler,et al.  Moray Revisited: High-Priority Affective Stimuli and Visual Search , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[65]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention , 2002 .

[66]  Serge Brédart,et al.  Attention to self-referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[67]  Jun-ichiro Kawahara,et al.  Does one's name attract visual attention? , 2004 .

[68]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[70]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Short article: one's own face is hard to ignore , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[71]  R. Roberts,et al.  Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. , 1994 .