Positive Deviance and Leadership: An Exploratory Field Study

Positive deviance refers to behavior that deviates from the norms of the reference group and has positive effects on the organization. It is an endogenous source of organizational creativity that has been shown to be powerful tool for learning and change. Despite growing interest, little remains known about the factors that stimulate positive deviance; in particular, how management can enable its emergence. In this paper, we explore the relationship between leadership and positive deviance through a conversion mixed methods field study of two hierarchical layers of store management in a large Australian retailer. Our findings indicate that management can best enable the emergence of positive deviance by combining empowering leadership behaviors with adequate levels of contingent reward and monitoring behaviors. These findings suggest that, depending on the frame of reference, positive deviance may emerge as a source for innovation that is endogenous to routines, rather than deviance from routines.

[1]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms , 1984 .

[2]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[3]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[4]  M. Marshall.  Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[6]  유화자.  기독교 사역과 Leadership , 1997 .

[7]  I. Coyne.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Robert E. Quinn,et al.  Empowered to lead: the role of psychological empowerment in leadership , 1999 .

[10]  Debashis Singh,et al.  Friends , 1999, BMJ.

[11]  R. Bennett,et al.  Development of a measure of workplace deviance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors , 2000 .

[14]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making , 2000 .

[15]  N. Vargo.  Empowering leadership. , 2000, Dermatology nursing.

[16]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[17]  Chris Dubelaar,et al.  Measuring retail productivity: what really matters? , 2002 .

[18]  Danielle E. Warren.  Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations , 2003 .

[19]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  J. George,et al.  Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence , 2003 .

[21]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[23]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance , 2004 .

[24]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[25]  Ronald J. Burke,et al.  Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: an exploratory study , 2006 .

[26]  William H. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research , 2006 .

[27]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work , 2007 .

[28]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Koen Dewettinck,et al.  Linking leadership empowerment behavior to employee attitudes and behavioral intentions: testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment , 2011 .

[30]  Young Mi Kim,et al.  Factors that enable nurse-patient communication in a family planning context: a positive deviance study. , 2008, International journal of nursing studies.

[31]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  7 Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives , 2009 .

[32]  Tina L. Juillerat.  Friends, not foes?: Work design and formalization in the modern work context , 2010 .

[33]  Wei Jun,et al.  New development of organizational commitment: A critical review (1960 - 2009) , 2010 .

[34]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[35]  Eli Lieber,et al.  Meeting the Practical Challenges of Mixed Methods Research , 2010 .

[36]  Manfred Max Bergman.  Hermeneutic Content Analysis : textual and audiovisual analysis within a mixed methods framework , 2010 .

[37]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[38]  S. Courtright,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Charles D. Kerns.  Promoting and Managing Positivity: A Coaching Approach , 2011 .

[40]  Brian Leavy.  Leading adaptive change by harnessing the power of positive deviance , 2011 .

[41]  G. Yukl,et al.  Effective Leadership Behavior: What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention , 2012 .

[42]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Utilizing Mixed Methods in Psychological Research , 2012 .

[43]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Work Design: Creating Jobs and Roles That Promote Individual Effectiveness , 2012 .

[44]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  From weapons to wildlife , 2012 .

[45]  B. Galperin,et al.  Exploring the Nomological Network of Workplace Deviance: Developing and Validating a Measure of Constructive Deviance , 2012 .

[46]  M. Pratt,et al.  Constructive Deviance in Organizations , 2013 .

[47]  C. Blank.  SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research , 2013 .

[48]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Exceptional boards: Environmental experience and positive deviance from institutional norms , 2013 .

[49]  Christina Hoon,et al.  Entering a Dialogue: Positioning Case Study Findings Towards Theory , 2014 .

[50]  Ed Snape,et al.  Empowering Leadership, Psychological Empowerment and Employee Outcomes: Testing a Multi‐Level Mediating Model , 2015 .

[51]  Stijn Viaene,et al.  Constructive deviance as a driver for performance in retail , 2016 .

[52]  Scott Sonenshein,et al.  Routines and Creativity: From Dualism to Duality , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Jan C. Recker,et al.  A Framework for the Study of Positive Deviance in Organizations , 2016 .

[54]  ชวิตรา ตันติมาลา.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis , 2017 .

[55]  Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin,et al.  Organisational trust as a mediator between perceived organisational support and constructive deviance , 2017 .