Speech evaluation and swallowing ability after intra‐oral cancer

In this study, four methods of postoperative speech evaluation are compared for 19 persons with oral cancers who have undergone oral surgery and/or radiotherapy. The Munich Intelligibility Profile was used for intelligibility testing and semiquantitative scoring by novice listeners. Expert ratings were done on the Therapy Outcome Measure (TOM) Phonological Disability form. For self‐evaluation, the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and the Head and Neck module was used. Swallowing function was scored on the TOM Dysphagia form. There was a high intercorrelation between the results of subjective speech evaluation by experts and non‐experts and the intelligibility test, but no correlation with any of these methods could be shown for the self‐evaluation by the participants. Voice quality seemed to have an influence on non‐expert scores. Swallowing was a more severe problem for our group than speech impairment.