Resolution of sub-element length scales in Brownian dynamics simulations of biopolymer networks with geometrically exact beam finite elements

Networks of crosslinked biopolymer filaments such as the cytoskeleton are the subject of intense research. Oftentimes, mechanics on the scale of single monomers ( ~ 5 ? n m ) govern the mechanics of the entire network ( ~ 10 ? µ m ). Until now, one either resolved the small scales and lost the big (network) picture or focused on mechanics above the single-filament scale and neglected the molecular architecture. Therefore, the study of network mechanics influenced by the entire spectrum of relevant length scales has been infeasible so far. We propose a method that reconciles both small and large length scales without the otherwise inevitable loss in either numerical efficiency or geometrical (molecular) detail. Both explicitly modeled species, filaments and their crosslinkers, are discretized with geometrically exact beam finite elements of Simo-Reissner type. Through specific coupling conditions between the elements of the two species, mechanical joints can be established anywhere along a beam's centerline, enabling arbitrary densities of chemical binding sites. These binding sites can be oriented to model the monomeric architecture of polymers. First, we carefully discuss the method and then demonstrate its capabilities by means of a series of numerical examples. We model crosslinked biopolymer networks with Brownian dynamics beam finite elements.Decoupling chemical and mechanical resolution, we boost computational efficiency.Our approach allows for network simulations reaching the scale of eukaryotic cells.We account for polar and chiral polymers and filament-linker reaction kinetics.We simulate the evolution, rheology, and effects of chirality of large networks.

[1]  José J. Muñoz,et al.  Sliding joints in 3D beams: Conserving algorithms using the master–slave approach , 2006 .

[2]  W. A. Wall,et al.  A single charge in the actin binding domain of fascin can independently tune the linear and non-linear response of an actin bundle network , 2015, The European Physical Journal E.

[3]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  An objective 3D large deformation finite element formulation for geometrically exact curved Kirchhoff rods , 2014 .

[4]  Ilpo Vattulainen,et al.  Strain hardening, avalanches, and strain softening in dense cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Wolfgang A Wall,et al.  Finite-element approach to Brownian dynamics of polymers. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  A locking-free finite element formulation and reduced models for geometrically exact Kirchhoff rods , 2015 .

[7]  Homin Shin,et al.  Structural Reorganization of Parallel Actin Bundles by Crosslinking Proteins: Incommensurate States of Twist , 2011 .

[8]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Dynamic role of cross-linking proteins in actin rheology. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[9]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Master-slave approach for the modelling of joints with dependent degrees of freedom in flexible mechanisms , 2003 .

[10]  Steven B Marston,et al.  The rates of formation and dissociation of actin-myosin complexes. Effects of solvent, temperature, nucleotide binding and head-head interactions. , 1982, The Biochemical journal.

[11]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Equilibrium phase diagram of semi-flexible polymer networks with linkers , 2013 .

[12]  M. Géradin,et al.  A beam finite element non‐linear theory with finite rotations , 1988 .

[13]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Micromechanical simulations of biopolymer networks with finite elements , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  A. Bausch,et al.  Cytoskeletal polymer networks: viscoelastic properties are determined by the microscopic interaction potential of cross-links. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[17]  A. Bausch,et al.  Helical twist controls the thickness of F-actin bundles , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Álvaro Ortega,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of rodlike and disklike particles in dilute solution , 2003 .

[19]  S. Edwards,et al.  The Theory of Polymer Dynamics , 1986 .

[20]  A. Bausch,et al.  Transient binding and dissipation in cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[21]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Preethi L. Chandran,et al.  Averaged implicit hydrodynamic model of semiflexible filaments. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Wolfgang A Wall,et al.  Discontinuous bundling transition in semiflexible polymer networks induced by Casimir interactions. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[24]  B. Alberts,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell (Fifth Edition) , 2008 .

[25]  L Cipelletti,et al.  Slow dynamics and internal stress relaxation in bundled cytoskeletal networks. , 2011, Nature materials.

[26]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics , 1999 .

[27]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of a Cross-linked Actin-like Network , 2009 .

[28]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Numerical method for the simulation of the Brownian dynamics of rod‐like microstructures with three‐dimensional nonlinear beam elements , 2012 .

[29]  Ram Dixit,et al.  Single molecule analysis of the Arabidopsis FRA1 kinesin shows that it is a functional motor protein with unusually high processivity. , 2011, Molecular plant.

[30]  Gerard C L Wong,et al.  Cooperativity and frustration in protein-mediated parallel actin bundles. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[31]  Gregory M Grason,et al.  Chirality and equilibrium biopolymer bundles. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[32]  Richard B. Lehoucq,et al.  Pseudo‐transient continuation for nonlinear transient elasticity , 2009 .

[33]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Rheology of semiflexible bundle networks with transient linkers. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[34]  Oliver Lieleg,et al.  Structure and dynamics of cross-linked actin networks , 2010 .

[35]  David A Weitz,et al.  Cross-link-governed dynamics of biopolymer networks. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[36]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[37]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  The interpolation of rotations and its application to finite element models of geometrically exact rods , 2004 .

[38]  Peng Chen,et al.  Strain stiffening induced by molecular motors in active crosslinked biopolymer networks , 2010, 1009.0548.

[39]  Wolfgang A Wall,et al.  Consistent finite-element approach to Brownian polymer dynamics with anisotropic friction. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .

[41]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[42]  A. Ibrahimbegovic On finite element implementation of geometrically nonlinear Reissner's beam theory: three-dimensional curved beam elements , 1995 .

[43]  Gregory M Grason,et al.  Theory of crosslinked bundles of helical filaments: intrinsic torques in self-limiting biopolymer assemblies. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[44]  Gregory M Grason,et al.  Braided bundles and compact coils: the structure and thermodynamics of hexagonally packed chiral filament assemblies. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Andreas R. Bausch,et al.  Cellular mechanosensing: Sharing the force. , 2013, Nature materials.