Citizen Knowledge and Choices on the Complex Issue of Nuclear Energy

The rise of a new set of complex and highly consequential issues has generated a heated debate about the place of the citizen in the decision-making process. This article examines how citizens choose one policy option over another on nuclear energy and whether informed citizens use a decision calculus fundamentally different from that of the uninformed. Knowledgeable citizens, we find, rely heavily on ideology, which also colors their cost-benefit calculations, while the unknowledgeable draw on their generalized outlooks toward technology and the cues provided by groups involved in the nuclear energy controversy.

[1]  Allan Mazur,et al.  Opposition to technological innovation , 1975 .

[2]  M. Sherif,et al.  An outline of social psychology , 1948 .

[3]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[4]  P. Sniderman.  Personality and Democratic Politics , 2024 .

[5]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  Personality and social change , 1943 .

[6]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[7]  H. J. Otway,et al.  Public Attitudes and Decision Making , 1977 .

[8]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[9]  P. J. Conover,et al.  The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications. , 1981 .

[10]  D. Orr.  U.S. Energy Policy and the Political Economy of Participation , 1979, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  C. Starr,et al.  Philosophical Basis for Risk Analysis , 1976 .

[12]  T. Tyler,et al.  Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[13]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  Beyond Economic Man. , 1977 .

[14]  S. Eisenstadt.  Studies in Reference Group Behaviour , 1954 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[16]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  The Two Faces of Issue Voting , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Political System Support and Public Response to the Energy Crisis , 1978 .

[18]  E. Hanushek.  Statistical methods for social scientists , 1977 .

[19]  D. Metlay,et al.  They watch and wonder. Public attitudes toward advanced technology , 1975 .

[20]  Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy , 1980 .

[21]  Lettie M,et al.  Nuclear Policy and Public Participation , 1978 .

[22]  A. Lovins,et al.  Soft energy paths , 1978, Nature.

[23]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[24]  Gerald Berk,et al.  Public Opposition to Nuclear Energy: Retrospect and Prospect , 1980 .

[25]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[26]  J. Steinbruner.  The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis , 1974 .

[27]  W. L. Rankin,et al.  Nuclear power and the public: analysis of collected survey research , 1977 .

[28]  Carl P. Hensler,et al.  Whites' Opposition to “Busing”: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics? , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[29]  W. Bennett,et al.  Public opinion in American politics , 1980 .

[30]  C Hohenemser,et al.  The distrust of nuclear power. , 1977, Science.

[31]  C. H. Coombs,et al.  Mathematical psychology : an elementary introduction , 1970 .

[32]  J. Coleman.  Longitudinal data analysis , 1984 .

[33]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Thought , 1979 .

[34]  Deborah R. Hensler,et al.  Evaluating nuclear power : voter choice on the California Nuclear Energy Initiative: , 1979 .

[35]  Warren E. Miller,et al.  Ideological Interpretations of Presidential Elections , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[36]  T. Shibutani,et al.  Reference Groups as Perspectives , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  R. Benedict,et al.  The Voters and Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power: a Comparative Study of "Nuclear Moratorium" Initiatives , 1980 .