Epigenetic asymmetry in the mammalian zygote and early embryo: relationship to lineage commitment?

Epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes and embryonic lineages exists at the earliest stages of mammalian development. The maternal genome in the zygote is highly methylated in both its DNA and its histones and most imprinted genes have maternal germline methylation imprints. The paternal genome is rapidly remodelled with protamine removal, addition of acetylated histones, and rapid demethylation of DNA before replication. A minority of imprinted genes have paternal germline methylation imprints. Methylation and chromatin reprogramming continues during cleavage divisions, but at the blastocyst stage lineage commitment to inner cell mass (ICM) or trophectoderm (TE) fate is accompanied by a dramatic increase in DNA and histone methylation, predominantly in the ICM. This may set up major epigenetic differences between embryonic and extraembryonic tissues, including in X-chromosome inactivation and perhaps imprinting. Maintaining epigenetic asymmetry appears important for development as asymmetry is lost in cloned embryos, most of which have developmental defects, and in particular an imbalance between extraembryonic and embryonic tissue development.

[1]  F. Ding,et al.  Genomic Imprinting Disrupted by a Maternal Effect Mutation in the Dnmt1 Gene , 2001, Cell.

[2]  T. Mukai,et al.  Domain regulation of imprinting cluster in Kip2/Lit1 subdomain on mouse chromosome 7F4/F5: large-scale DNA methylation analysis reveals that DMR-Lit1 is a putative imprinting control region. , 2002, Genome research.

[3]  Yong-Mahn Han,et al.  Limited demethylation leaves mosaic‐type methylation states in cloned bovine pre‐implantation embryos , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[4]  J. Chaillet.  Genomic imprinting: lessons from mouse transgenes. , 1994, Mutation research.

[5]  Wendy Dean,et al.  Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[6]  A. Niveleau,et al.  Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos , 2001, Current Biology.

[7]  T. Shioda,et al.  X inactivation in the mouse embryo deficient for Dnmt1: distinct effect of hypomethylation on imprinted and random X inactivation. , 2000, Developmental biology.

[8]  A. Bird,et al.  Absence of genome-wide changes in DNA methylation during development of the zebrafish , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[9]  W. Reik,et al.  Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse , 2003, Genesis.

[10]  E. Wolf,et al.  Epigenetic Marking Correlates with Developmental Potential in Cloned Bovine Preimplantation Embryos , 2003, Current Biology.

[11]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene , 2000, Nature.

[12]  C. Wylie.  Primordial germ cells , 1980, Nature.

[13]  W. Reik,et al.  Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote , 2000, Current Biology.

[14]  W. Reik,et al.  Evolution of imprinting mechanisms: the battle of the sexes begins in the zygote , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[15]  M. Surani,et al.  Genome-wide methylation patterns in normal and uniparental early mouse embryos. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[16]  M. Surani,et al.  Transgenes as molecular probes for genomic imprinting. , 1988, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[17]  Wendy Dean,et al.  Regulation of supply and demand for maternal nutrients in mammals by imprinted genes , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  T. Bestor,et al.  Dnmt3L and the Establishment of Maternal Genomic Imprints , 2001, Science.

[19]  W. Reik,et al.  Epigenetic modifications in an imprinting cluster are controlled by a hierarchy of DMRs suggesting long-range chromatin interactions. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[20]  A. Niveleau,et al.  DNA methylation at promoter regions regulates the timing of gene activation in Xenopus laevis embryos. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[21]  M. Sasaki,et al.  Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse , 1975, Nature.

[22]  Tony Kouzarides,et al.  Histone methylation defines epigenetic asymmetry in the mouse zygote. , 2002, The International journal of developmental biology.

[23]  M. Szyf,et al.  A mammalian protein with specific demethylase activity for mCpG DNA , 1999, Nature.

[24]  S. Perreault.  Chromatin remodeling in mammalian zygotes. , 1992, Mutation research.

[25]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Mitotically Stable Association of Polycomb Group Proteins Eed and Enx1 with the Inactive X Chromosome in Trophoblast Stem Cells , 2002, Current Biology.

[26]  M. Bartolomei,et al.  Mechanisms of genomic imprinting. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[27]  Wendy Dean,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming in early mammalian development and following somatic nuclear transfer. , 2003, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[28]  T. Haaf,et al.  Aberrant methylation patterns at the two‐cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure , 2002, Molecular reproduction and development.

[29]  J. Lee,et al.  Disruption of Imprinted X Inactivation by Parent-of-Origin Effects at Tsix , 2000, Cell.

[30]  E. Li,et al.  Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. , 2002, Development.

[31]  J. P. Jackson,et al.  Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase , 2002, Nature.

[32]  D. Haig,et al.  Parental modifiers, antisense transcripts and loss of imprinting , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  D. Barlow,et al.  5 The origins of genomic imprinting in mammals , 2002 .

[34]  W. Reik,et al.  Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  V. Chapman,et al.  Preferential expression of the maternally derived X chromosome in the mouse yolk sac , 1977, Cell.

[36]  T. Magnuson,et al.  Imprinted X inactivation maintained by a mouse Polycomb group gene , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[37]  F. P. Villena,et al.  Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[38]  J. Renard,et al.  Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. , 1997, Development.

[39]  Tony Kouzarides,et al.  The Methyl-CpG-binding Protein MeCP2 Links DNA Methylation to Histone Methylation* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Benjamin Tycko,et al.  The Tnfrh1 (Tnfrsf23) gene is weakly imprinted in several organs and expressed at the trophoblast-decidua interface , 2002, BMC Genetics.

[41]  M. Surani,et al.  Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development , 1984, Nature.

[42]  J. Walter,et al.  Embryogenesis: Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome , 2000, Nature.

[43]  J. Park,et al.  Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[44]  W Dean,et al.  Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: Aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  H. Cedar,et al.  Gene expression: The amazing demethylase , 1999, Nature.

[46]  B. Pickard,et al.  Epigenetic targeting in the mouse zygote marks DNA for later methylation: a mechanism for maternal effects in development , 2001, Mechanisms of Development.

[47]  Jörn Walter,et al.  The pre-implantation ontogeny of the H19 methylation imprint , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[48]  W. Reik,et al.  Deletion of a silencer element in Igf2 results in loss of imprinting independent of H19 , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[49]  Shirley M. Tilghman,et al.  CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus , 2000, Nature.

[50]  V. Chapman,et al.  Cell lineage-specific undermethylation of mouse repetitive DNA , 1984, Nature.

[51]  V. Chapman,et al.  Undermethylation of structural gene sequences in extraembryonic lineages of the mouse. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[52]  A. Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Genomic imprinting: Mother maintains methylation marks , 2001, Current Biology.

[53]  L. E. Young,et al.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer , 2002, Nature.

[54]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Heterochromatin, HP1 and methylation at lysine 9 of histone H3 in animals , 2002, Chromosoma.

[55]  E. Selker,et al.  A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa , 2001, Nature.

[56]  M. Surani,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells , 2002, Mechanisms of Development.

[57]  W. Reik,et al.  An intragenic methylated region in the imprinted Igf2 gene augments transcription , 2001, EMBO reports.

[58]  N. Ogonuki,et al.  Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. , 2002, Development.

[59]  X. Yang,et al.  Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[60]  R. Reinhardt,et al.  Sequence and functional comparison in the Beckwith-Wiedemann region: implications for a novel imprinting centre and extended imprinting. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[61]  D. Barlow,et al.  Bidirectional action of the Igf2r imprint control element on upstream and downstream imprinted genes. , 2001, Genes & development.

[62]  K. Mochida,et al.  Faithful expression of imprinted genes in cloned mice. , 2002, Science.

[63]  D. Solter,et al.  Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes , 1984, Cell.

[64]  M. Surani,et al.  Imprinting and the Epigenetic Asymmetry Between Parental Genomes , 2001, Science.