The neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments.

Arrows terminating a line can distort the perceived line length. This so-called Müller-Lyer illusion can be used in healthy human subjects to mimic the performance of neglect patients in visuospatial judgments (e.g., in the landmark task). In this study, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion, the landmark task, and their interaction. This was achieved by parametrically manipulating the magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion both in a landmark and in a luminance (control) task. As expected, the landmark task activated right posterior parietal cortex and right temporo-occipital cortex. In contrast, the neural processes associated with the strength of the Müller-Lyer illusion were located bilaterally in the lateral occipital cortex as well as the right superior parietal cortex. The data not only converge with but also extend neuropsychological data that indicate maintained line-length illusion in neglect patients. In addition, our results support the size-constancy scaling hypothesis as a putative mechanism underlying line-length illusions. Furthermore, activation that was driven by both the task and the strength of the Müller-Lyer illusion was observed in right intraparietal sulcus, thus arguing in favor of an interaction of illusory information with the top-down processes underlying visuospatial judgments in right parietal cortex.

[1]  John C. Marshall,et al.  How Long is a Piece of String? A Study of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1988, Cortex.

[2]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Perceptual and Response Bias in Unilateral Neglect: Two Modified Versions of the Milner Landmark Task , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Does Interhemispheric Competition Mediate Motion-Induced Blindness? A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Perception.

[5]  R. Mayeux,et al.  Hemispatial neglect , 1989, Neurology.

[6]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors? , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  A. Dobbins,et al.  Distance modulation of neural activity in the visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[8]  M. Harvey,et al.  Illusion processing in hemispatial neglect , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  A comparison of frontoparietal fMRI activation during anti-saccades and anti-pointing. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Differential effects of the Müller-Lyer illusion on reflexive and voluntary saccades. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[11]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  C. Genovese,et al.  Spatial Updating in Human Parietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[13]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[14]  A. Milner,et al.  Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  P. Cz. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik , 1896 .

[17]  K. Zilles,et al.  The Neural Basis of Vertical and Horizontal Line Bisection Judgments: An fMRI Study of Normal Volunteers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Functional Organization of Human Intraparietal and Frontal Cortex for Attending, Looking, and Pointing , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[20]  M. Petrides,et al.  Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  S. Zeki,et al.  Brain Activity Related to the Perception of Illusory Contours , 1996, NeuroImage.

[22]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Local Elements into Global Shapes in the Human Visual Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.

[23]  K. Zilles,et al.  Nicotine Modulates Reorienting of Visuospatial Attention and Neural Activity in Human Parietal Cortex , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[24]  Astrid Busch,et al.  Visual search for apparent-length targets is modulated by the Müller-Lyer illusion. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[25]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  ‘Where’ depends on ‘what’: A differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one- versus two-dimensions , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  G Vallar,et al.  Processing of illusion of length in spatial hemineglect: a study of line bisection , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Richard A. Tyrrell,et al.  A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: The Modified Binary Search (MOBS) , 1988 .

[29]  R. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual illusions and brain models , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[30]  John C. Marshall,et al.  When Right Goes Left: An Investigation of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1989, Cortex.

[31]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Thomas Stephan,et al.  Performing allocentric visuospatial judgments with induced distortion of the egocentric reference frame: an fMRI study with clinical implications , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Rafal,et al.  Perception of geometric illusions in hemispatial neglect , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The Effects of Unilateral Visuospatial Neglect on Perception of Müller-Lyer Illusory Figures , 1995, Perception.

[35]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  Visuospatial attention: how to measure effects of infrequent, unattended events in a blocked stimulus design , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[38]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  R A Andersen,et al.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  P. C. Murphy,et al.  Cerebral Cortex , 2017, Cerebral Cortex.

[42]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Differential cortical activation during voluntary and reflexive saccades in man , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995, Psychological review.

[44]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[46]  S. Ferber,et al.  Size perception in hemianopia and neglect. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  H. R. Siebner,et al.  Parietal Magnetic Stimulation Delays Visuomotor Mental Rotation at Increased Processing Demands , 2002, NeuroImage.

[49]  Astrid Busch,et al.  The Ebbinghaus illusion modulates visual search for size-defined targets: Evidence for preattentive processing of apparent object size , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Functional anatomy and differential time courses of neural processing for explicit, inferred, and illusory contours An event-related fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  S. Cappa,et al.  Illusions of Length in Spatial Unilateral Neglect * * Supported by grants from the MURST and the Ministero della Sanità to Giuseppe Vallar. , 2001, Cortex.

[53]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[54]  Y Tsal,et al.  A Mueller–Lyer Illusion Induced by Selective Attention , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[55]  B. J. McCurtain,et al.  Dorsal cortical regions subserving visually guided saccades in humans: an fMRI study. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.