An enlarged postcranial sample confirms Australopithecus afarensis dimorphism was similar to modern humans

In a previous study, we introduced the template method as a means of enlarging the Australopithecus afarensis postcranial sample to more accurately estimate its skeletal dimorphism. Results indicated dimorphism to be largely comparable to that of Homo sapiens. Some have since argued that our results were biased by artificial homogeneity in our Au. afarensis sample. Here we report the results from inclusion of 12 additional, newly reported, specimens. The results are consistent with those of our original study and with the hypothesis that early hominid demographic success derived from a reproductive strategy involving male provisioning of pair-bonded females.

[1]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Ardipithecus ramidus and the Paleobiology of Early Hominids , 2009, Science.

[2]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Paleobiological Implications of the Ardipithecus ramidus Dentition , 2009, Science.

[3]  C. Lovejoy.  Reexamining Human Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus , 2009, Science.

[4]  R. Lawler.  Monomorphism, male-male competition, and mechanisms of sexual dimorphism. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[5]  Elizabeth H. Harmon.  Size and shape variation in the proximal femur of Australopithecus africanus. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[6]  B. Richmond,et al.  Strong postcranial size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis: results from two new resampling methods for multivariate data sets with missing data. , 2008, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  L. Stroik,et al.  Bootstrap tests of significance and the case for humanlike skeletal-size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[8]  Elizabeth H. Harmon.  Size and shape variation in Australopithecus afarensis proximal femora. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[9]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  The case is unchanged and remains robust: Australopithecus afarensis exhibits only moderate skeletal dimorphism. A reply to Plavcan et al. (2005). , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[10]  Y. Rak,et al.  Associated cranial and forelimb remains attributed to Australopithecus afarensis from Hadar, Ethiopia. , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[11]  J. Plavcan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis revisited: how strong is the case for a human-like pattern of dimorphism? , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[12]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  B. Richmond,et al.  Randomization procedures and sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis , 1996 .

[14]  Y. Rak,et al.  The first skull and other new discoveries of Australopithecus afarensis at Hadar, Ethiopia , 1994, Nature.

[15]  C. Lovejoy.  Modeling Human Origins: Are We Sexy Because We're Smart, Or Smart Because We're Sexy? , 1993 .

[16]  D. Johanson,et al.  The hominid composition of Afar Locality 333; some preliminary observations , 1989 .

[17]  A. B. Ford,et al.  The Physical and Mental Health of Aged Women , 1985 .

[18]  Donald C. Johanson,et al.  Hominid upper limb bones recovered from the Hadar formation: 1974–1977 collections , 1982 .

[19]  Lovejoy Co.  The origin of man. , 1981, Science.

[20]  Sergiusz Pietraszewski.  Methods to estimate sexual dimorphism from unsexed samples: A test with computer-generated samples , 2004 .

[21]  Ralph L. Holloway,et al.  The Skull Of Australopithecus Afarensis , 2004 .

[22]  M F Teaford,et al.  Partial skeleton of Proconsul nyanzae from Mfangano Island, Kenya. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  H. Mchenry.  Sexual dimorphism inAustralopithecus afarensis , 1991 .

[24]  A. Walker,et al.  The hunt for Proconsul. , 1989, Scientific American.

[25]  C. K. Brain.  The Hunters or the Hunted , 1981 .

[26]  David Machin.  The Binomial Expansion , 1976 .

[27]  A. Montagu.  The Natural Superiority of Women , 1953 .